From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: iyzsong@member.fsf.org (=?utf-8?B?5a6L5paH5q2m?=) Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/5] Sphinx reproducibility update Date: Sat, 02 Jul 2016 21:07:32 +0800 Message-ID: <8737ns194b.fsf@member.fsf.org> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:33410) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bJKeA-0007q2-QE for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 02 Jul 2016 09:07:47 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bJKe7-0004a9-KI for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 02 Jul 2016 09:07:46 -0400 Received: from mail.openmailbox.org ([62.4.1.34]:55198) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bJKe7-0004a4-Dh for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 02 Jul 2016 09:07:43 -0400 In-Reply-To: (Leo Famulari's message of "Fri, 1 Jul 2016 21:04:48 -0400") List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-devel" To: Leo Famulari Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org Leo Famulari writes: > [...] > > With this change, many Python 2 packages will become reproducible, at > least on a single machine; the only thing holding them back was the > manpage timestamps. Cool! > > These changes will require 142 rebuilds, mostly of Python packages, but > also of libreoffice (libreoffice seems to depend on *everything*) and a > few others. If the patches are good, should they go to master or to > another branch? > I prefer master, and I guess people who use libreoffice don't update it frequently (we have a old version, but no one complain so far).