From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: ng0 <ng0@we.make.ritual.n0.is>
Subject: Re: [PATCH]: opensmtpd, opensmtpd-extras, libasr.
Date: Wed, 21 Sep 2016 08:35:50 +0000
Message-ID: <8737ktfy55.fsf@we.make.ritual.n0.is>
References: <87lgz2tzfq.fsf@we.make.ritual.n0.is>
	<20160908232102.4faeca44@openmailbox.org>
	<87mvjg3g1q.fsf@we.make.ritual.n0.is>
	<20160920214815.GA7018@jasmine>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Return-path: <guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:54571)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <ng0@we.make.ritual.n0.is>) id 1bmd0j-0000Km-QE
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 21 Sep 2016 04:36:10 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <ng0@we.make.ritual.n0.is>) id 1bmd0f-0001q6-JR
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 21 Sep 2016 04:36:08 -0400
Received: from aibo.runbox.com ([91.220.196.211]:57063)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <ng0@we.make.ritual.n0.is>) id 1bmd0f-0001pl-CP
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 21 Sep 2016 04:36:05 -0400
In-Reply-To: <20160920214815.GA7018@jasmine>
List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution."
	<guix-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/guix-devel>,
	<mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-devel/>
List-Post: <mailto:guix-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guix-devel>,
	<mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: "Guix-devel" <guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
To: Leo Famulari <leo@famulari.name>
Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org

Leo Famulari <leo@famulari.name> writes:

> [ Unknown signature status ]
> On Fri, Sep 09, 2016 at 09:43:29PM +0000, ng0 wrote:
>> I commented mariadb + postgresql for now. I want some feedback first if
>> you think we should provide it this way, or if we should add both to
>> different outputs.
>> It would not make much difference in the size of the dependency graph
>> unless one creates a opensmtpd-extras-postgresql package for example
>> which just builds the postgresql related things.
>
> Is it even possible to split the package up like that? I don't think
> it's necessary anyways. I think we should pick a database (I'd choose
> postgresql) and add the package. If somebody wants to use mariadb, we
> can add it when they request it.

Okay, I agree. Can the committer makes the change locally, or should I
send in new versions?
-- 
              ng0