From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Ricardo Wurmus Subject: Re: texmaker, Qt and Chromium Date: Sat, 08 Oct 2016 11:18:55 +0200 Message-ID: <8737k7urk0.fsf@elephly.net> References: <877f9kufxx.fsf@elephly.net> <87shs7xno6.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:46983) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bsnmh-0008IC-Dl for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 08 Oct 2016 05:19:12 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bsnmf-000233-HS for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 08 Oct 2016 05:19:10 -0400 In-reply-to: <87shs7xno6.fsf@gnu.org> List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-devel" To: Roel Janssen Cc: guix-devel Roel Janssen writes: > Ricardo Wurmus writes: >> What do you think? The alternative is to drop Texmaker and all the >> other packages that depend on Chromium as distributed by Qt. > > I'm not super familiar with Qt modules anymore, but can't we just > package the QtWebKit module? How does QtWebEngine relate to QtWebKit? I’m not familiar with this myself, but QtWebEngine is needed to build QtWebView. (There is no downloadable QtWebKit submodule.) > Also, I know that Calibre is broken (it compiles file, but it doesn't > start anymore) since we are missing the QtWebKit module. Yet another package for which we would need to decide: remove the package or add “qtwebengine”. ~~ Ricardo