From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Ricardo Wurmus <rekado@elephly.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] gnu: Add seq24.
Date: Tue, 06 Dec 2016 10:14:04 +0100
Message-ID: <8737i1s9lv.fsf@elephly.net>
References: <20161205100229.11347-1-rekado@elephly.net>
	<20161205221957.GB1931@jasmine>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Return-path: <guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:54128)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <rekado@elephly.net>) id 1cEBpo-0008IZ-0I
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 06 Dec 2016 04:14:48 -0500
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <rekado@elephly.net>) id 1cEBpk-0007jc-CH
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 06 Dec 2016 04:14:47 -0500
Received: from sender163-mail.zoho.com ([74.201.84.163]:21427)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32)
	(Exim 4.71) (envelope-from <rekado@elephly.net>) id 1cEBpk-0007h7-4b
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 06 Dec 2016 04:14:44 -0500
In-reply-to: <20161205221957.GB1931@jasmine>
List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution."
	<guix-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/guix-devel>,
	<mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-devel/>
List-Post: <mailto:guix-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guix-devel>,
	<mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: "Guix-devel" <guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
To: Leo Famulari <leo@famulari.name>
Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org


Leo Famulari <leo@famulari.name> writes:

> On Mon, Dec 05, 2016 at 11:02:28AM +0100, Ricardo Wurmus wrote:
>> * gnu/packages/music.scm (seq24): New variable.
>> * gnu/packages/patches/seq24-rename-mutex.patch: New file.
>> * gnu/local.mk (dist_patch_DATA): Register patch.
>
>> diff --git a/gnu/packages/patches/seq24-rename-mutex.patch b/gnu/packages/patches/seq24-rename-mutex.patch
>> new file mode 100644
>> index 0000000..270abb6
>> --- /dev/null
>> +++ b/gnu/packages/patches/seq24-rename-mutex.patch
>> @@ -0,0 +1,122 @@
>> +The custom mutex definition in Seq24 clashes with the mutex defined in gtkmm.
>> +This patch renames the custom definition.
>
> Should we report this upstream?

Yes, I just reported it and added the URL to the top of our patch file.

-- 
Ricardo

GPG: BCA6 89B6 3655 3801 C3C6  2150 197A 5888 235F ACAC
http://elephly.net