From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Alex Kost Subject: Re: [PATCH] gnu: Update 'geiser' hash and deprecate 'geiser-next'. Date: Thu, 08 Dec 2016 12:33:20 +0300 Message-ID: <8737hydau7.fsf@gmail.com> References: <87shqa9h4l.fsf@gmail.com> <8760mv74zt.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:60120) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cEv6F-0005x9-2O for guix-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 08 Dec 2016 04:34:48 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cEv6B-0002k6-3h for guix-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 08 Dec 2016 04:34:47 -0500 In-Reply-To: <8760mv74zt.fsf@gnu.org> ("Ludovic \=\?utf-8\?Q\?Court\=C3\=A8s\=22'\?\= \=\?utf-8\?Q\?s\?\= message of "Wed, 07 Dec 2016 23:23:50 +0100") List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-devel" To: Ludovic =?utf-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org Ludovic Court=C3=A8s (2016-12-07 23:23 +0100) wrote: > Alex Kost skribis: > >> As several people noticed, the release tarball of Geiser 0.9 was updated >> in place some time ago. >> >> The story is: Federico found that Geiser 0.9 does not contain some files >> for Chibi and Chez, so he let the upstream know about it=C2=B9, and added >> 'geiser-next' package=C2=B2. Then JAOR (the maintainer of Geiser) updat= ed >> 0.9 tarball in place. >> >> So since Geiser 0.9 contains those missing files for Chibi and Chez now, >> I think we can deprecate 'geiser-next' again (along with updating the >> hash of the 'geiser' source tarball), WDYT? > > Definitely, please push! > > Thanks, and sorry for the delay. No problem, thanks for looking at it! --=20 Alex