From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic =?utf-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?=) Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/6] gnu: Add ceph. Date: Wed, 18 Jan 2017 22:27:45 +0100 Message-ID: <8737gg83e6.fsf@gnu.org> References: <20170115203338.19769-1-mbakke@fastmail.com> <20170115203338.19769-6-mbakke@fastmail.com> <87a8apb8x1.fsf@gnu.org> <87r3419t9l.fsf@kirby.i-did-not-set--mail-host-address--so-tickle-me> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:57223) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cTxlo-0000co-LG for guix-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 18 Jan 2017 16:27:53 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cTxll-000449-DM for guix-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 18 Jan 2017 16:27:52 -0500 In-Reply-To: <87r3419t9l.fsf@kirby.i-did-not-set--mail-host-address--so-tickle-me> (Marius Bakke's message of "Wed, 18 Jan 2017 00:11:18 +0100") List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-devel" To: Marius Bakke Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org Hi! Marius Bakke skribis: > Ludovic Court=C3=A8s writes: [...] >>> + ;; Ceph is licensed under LGPL2.1, but includes a number of compon= ents >>> + ;; covered by other licenses. Consult COPYING for full information. >>> + (license (list license:lgpl2.1 >>> + license:cc-by-sa3.0 ; documentation >>> + license:bsd-2 ; xxHash >>> + license:bsd-3 >>> + license:gpl3 >>> + license:gpl2 >>> + license:public-domain >>> + license:boost1.0 >>> + license:expat)))) >> >> No =E2=80=9Cor any later version=E2=80=9D clause for the GNU licenses he= re? > > Oops, yes, there are some gpl2+ files at least. But Ceph itself is > LGPL2.1 only AFAICT; the COPYING file has a debian-style copyright > format and adds "or later" on some components but not on '*'. No > copyright headers in the source files I've checked. > > Unfortunately COPYING does not cover the bundled components, so I still > have some digging to do. OK. >> other issues, that looks good. Great work! > > Thanks! I'm sure there is a lot of work remaining to make *everything* > work (e.g. 'ceph-deploy'), but will make sure it's possible to provision > a cluster the "old school" way at least :-) Cool. :-) I guess it can be fixed incrementally as you stumble upon problems. Cheers, Ludo=E2=80=99.