From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Alex Vong Subject: Re: [contact.ng0@cryptolab.net: Re: [security-discuss] gnuradio project DoS attacks GNU wget users] Date: Fri, 03 Mar 2017 20:42:09 +0800 Message-ID: <8737eu5y72.fsf@gmail.com> References: <20170303110843.o6i4xrl2mvechkbu@abyayala> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature" Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:45129) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cjmXX-0007pj-1R for guix-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 03 Mar 2017 07:42:32 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cjmXT-0002u3-R0 for guix-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 03 Mar 2017 07:42:30 -0500 Received: from mail-pf0-x244.google.com ([2607:f8b0:400e:c00::244]:36556) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cjmXT-0002tr-Jc for guix-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 03 Mar 2017 07:42:27 -0500 Received: by mail-pf0-x244.google.com with SMTP id j5so9854665pfb.3 for ; Fri, 03 Mar 2017 04:42:27 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <20170303110843.o6i4xrl2mvechkbu@abyayala> (ng0's message of "Fri, 3 Mar 2017 11:08:43 +0000") List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-devel" To: guix-devel@gnu.org --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain ng0 writes: [...] > > I have a correction to make: after someone else in a conversation told > me that it works for them, I tried to reproduce my problem. THe problem > is just when I use the ftp:// links, everything else works. > > Which means, `torify telnet alpha.gnu.org 21' worked as well as > accessing the ftp over `http://alpha.gnu.org' and `http://ftp.gnu.org', > previously I assumed the ftp of gnu.org is still limited to only ftp > port access. So there is a problem with port 21 and maybe 20, but this > problem exists only because a majority of tor relays filter those ports. > > I think the only improvement GNU can make is to have a list of onion > services, if GNU wants to. This can be achieved like Debian does with > https://onion.debian.org/ but it can also be achieved with sub domains > to just one onion. For an example take a look at http://secushare.org/ > and http://youbroketheinternet.org where secushare.org mentions the > onion at the bottom of the page and for the second domain I have > forgotten where the anchor for the "Why not HTTPS" is. > [...] I would like to add that there is a software called onionbalance which is useful for deloying hidden service[0]. [0]: https://blog.torproject.org/blog/cooking-onions-finding-onionbalance --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAEBCgAdFiEEdZDkzSn0Cycogr9IxYq4eRf1Ea4FAli5ZKIACgkQxYq4eRf1 Ea6dkw//SnXWEYuU6LFjB/nsFVlaHARbIK/3LZIiF4wY0BTNjxkQaG5Pv5SG67A1 oHgMMt/q8L//z/J/5nBRqpmTxKAza3SFfAQaCxyZwNMpcBaTOQdth569/ozNKUKb AqpyfE1P+fm7+tkPItgsNJgf21NVdv7fzBxv6oxbM2k3QBypio9Ab9izqZ1tVkjV 7K+wxr6A2xFMqkeFFKbIN9Y3NYwsI4LmhNLeO0teAPpd4YANYIorwoV3YVvUztAk ZdtqGV2aO4qDQ8Zb6ZLPTRC6GIWSRPd4wzoeiakSsPXIYKpGdRxlfXGn2UblUzsl SxzoaOmirLwhIJjPqgRu79x4J5SJ599amUoCnC5sFvN3FA/5hAdbqjzgUUKcV3gk qbBgEIZI5GoQTZJB6y/zg8tvOcMKF2YMTAdqgZraeq+0Ma1fN5cs+x4BDmqTGuyx jVxCHus0gC23qzlsPU2SKYkKqVOtMuSOX4FOaYz0Xy1L98+N8Eqn6egKDQd0+IH4 +5Doai0455eQFnWwJD7ItNZ7zaH361+1Y9DF25KLlqLs9iawGONrFg15ncGjJqgL sjZ0yAv9qKvsCGC1+DG/S8u7s06/BV/MMGeTVZN1DnDlFIT8o2S0msrbhc3YPcQF xzerzJ/6O5j7X5jozfxqQ2j3nTHddOaGL2dpiKzX0XWBJYPORow= =WpC9 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=--