From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Christopher Allan Webber Subject: Re: Getting rid of alpha label Date: Fri, 14 Apr 2017 09:50:01 -0500 Message-ID: <8737db11t2.fsf@dustycloud.org> References: <20170412062401.GA8251@mail.thebird.nl> <87shlcnymk.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:38631) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cz2Y6-00033B-QC for guix-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 14 Apr 2017 10:50:11 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cz2Y5-0004Nu-Qo for guix-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 14 Apr 2017 10:50:10 -0400 In-reply-to: <87shlcnymk.fsf@gnu.org> List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-devel" To: Ludovic =?utf-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= Cc: guix-devel Ludovic Court=C3=A8s writes: > Heya! > > Pjotr Prins skribis: > >> Can we get rid of the alpha status? It suggests packages are in alpha, >> which they are not.=20 >> >> I have already had two different administrators in two environments >> claiming that Guix packages can not be deployed on HPC systems because >> it is alpha.=20 >> >> The excuse is too easy ;) > > I agree. ;-) > > After FOSDEM Ricardo removed the big blue banner that was saying Guix i= s > alpha/beta. So now the only mentions of =E2=80=9Cbeta=E2=80=9D that ar= e left are: > > 1. on the =E2=80=9CTEST=E2=80=9D button on the home page; > 2. under GuixSD at . > > I think we can remove #1. Is this what you had in mind? > > Cheers, > Ludo=E2=80=99. +1