From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:37617)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1d4OT3-00045V-UM
	for guix-patches@gnu.org; Sat, 29 Apr 2017 05:15:06 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1d4OSz-0005kk-W5
	for guix-patches@gnu.org; Sat, 29 Apr 2017 05:15:05 -0400
Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:47310)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16)
	(Exim 4.71) (envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>)
	id 1d4OSz-0005kY-Td
	for guix-patches@gnu.org; Sat, 29 Apr 2017 05:15:01 -0400
Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2)
	(envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1d4OSz-0000vV-OS
	for guix-patches@gnu.org; Sat, 29 Apr 2017 05:15:01 -0400
Subject: bug#26685: certbot service
Resent-Message-ID: <handler.26685.B26685.14934572513487@debbugs.gnu.org>
References: <cucmvb1ehiv.fsf@igalia.com> <87mvb0ubog.fsf@lassieur.org>
	<cuc1sscem1e.fsf@igalia.com>
From: =?UTF-8?Q?Cl=C3=A9ment?= Lassieur <clement@lassieur.org>
In-reply-to: <cuc1sscem1e.fsf@igalia.com>
Date: Sat, 29 Apr 2017 11:14:06 +0200
Message-ID: <8737crmv8h.fsf@lassieur.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
List-Id: <guix-patches.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/guix-patches>,
	<mailto:guix-patches-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:guix-patches@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:guix-patches-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guix-patches>,
	<mailto:guix-patches-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: guix-patches-bounces+kyle=kyleam.com@gnu.org
Sender: "Guix-patches" <guix-patches-bounces+kyle=kyleam.com@gnu.org>
To: Andy Wingo <wingo@igalia.com>
Cc: 26685@debbugs.gnu.org

Andy Wingo <wingo@igalia.com> writes:

> BTW if you are interested in using/hacking on this, I think we could
> just get it into master and patch it from there.  WDYT?

Ok!