From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Mark H Weaver Subject: bug#31187: core-updates: url-fetch/tarbomb, url-fetch/zipbomb fail with "unbound variable: invoke" Date: Thu, 19 Apr 2018 07:33:24 -0400 Message-ID: <8736zrl9bv.fsf@netris.org> References: <20180416205439.1644149e@centurylink.net> <871sfci9n7.fsf@netris.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:47587) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1f97qE-00058L-5b for bug-guix@gnu.org; Thu, 19 Apr 2018 07:35:12 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1f97qB-0002ld-1A for bug-guix@gnu.org; Thu, 19 Apr 2018 07:35:06 -0400 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:52261) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1f97qA-0002lM-Px for bug-guix@gnu.org; Thu, 19 Apr 2018 07:35:02 -0400 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1f97qA-00047G-EZ for bug-guix@gnu.org; Thu, 19 Apr 2018 07:35:02 -0400 Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-To: bug-guix@gnu.org Resent-Message-ID: In-Reply-To: (Glenn Morris's message of "Wed, 18 Apr 2018 17:27:44 -0400") List-Id: Bug reports for GNU Guix List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-guix-bounces+gcggb-bug-guix=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "bug-Guix" To: Glenn Morris Cc: 31187-done@debbugs.gnu.org, Eric Bavier Hi Glenn, Thanks very much for your informative message. I feel embarrassed for not noticing that there were multiple pages. I rarely use the web interface, and I guess the projects I've worked tend to have fewer than 400 active bugs. Glenn Morris writes: > If Eric had used X-Debbugs-CC instead of Cc in the initial report, the > mail you got would have included the bug number in the subject. > I believe this is well documented (eg on the "how to report a bug" > section on https://debbugs.gnu.org/). Okay, I will try to remind people to use 'X-Debbugs-CC' instead of 'Cc' in the future. >> I've reported these problems to the FSF sysadmins, and I'd like to give >> them an opportunity to diagnose the problem before we change the status >> of this bug. > > The FSF sysadmins don't maintain debbugs.gnu.org, so the help-debbugs > list would have been better. I (debbugs.gnu.org maintainer) happened to > see your mail although I don't normally read bug-guix. That was quite fortuitous. Thanks again! I'm closing this bug now. Mark