From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Ricardo Wurmus Subject: Re: GSoC: Adding a web interface similar to the Hydra web interface Date: Tue, 12 Jun 2018 23:52:45 +0200 Message-ID: <8736xrd64y.fsf@elephly.net> References: <87vac3twbe.fsf@gnu.org> <87o9hog2ye.fsf@elephly.net> <87d0xyn9zs.fsf@elephly.net> <87d0xswvls.fsf@elephly.net> <87r2m4ntk4.fsf@mdc-berlin.de> <87tvqxy4i9.fsf@elephly.net> <87in78hxo2.fsf@elephly.net> <878t7xb58o.fsf@elephly.net> <874lijbqvf.fsf@elephly.net> <20180606200210.7a9c4dd6@scratchpost.org> <20180612183504.2621cefa@scratchpost.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:36827) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fSrE3-0001H1-71 for guix-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 12 Jun 2018 17:53:16 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fSrDz-0001RC-7G for guix-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 12 Jun 2018 17:53:15 -0400 Received: from sender-of-o51.zoho.com ([135.84.80.216]:21030) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fSrDy-0001Qh-Ro for guix-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 12 Jun 2018 17:53:11 -0400 In-reply-to: <20180612183504.2621cefa@scratchpost.org> List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-devel" To: Tatiana Sholokhova Cc: guix-devel Hi Tatiana, I have only little to add to Danny=E2=80=99s comments. > db-get-builds looks fine and we could merge this change to master. > But you have other changes in the same commit, so we can't directly > cherry-pick it. (not so bad, but somewhat cumbersome now) It is good practise to make small commits, one for every set of logically connected changes. This makes the review simpler and it makes it easier to merge some parts while leaving others for later. As you work on the changes that Danny=E2=80=99s comments imply, please take= the opportunity to group related changes and commit only those together. It is fine and desirable to have many independent small commits. Thanks again for your excellent work! -- Ricardo