From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= Subject: bug#33772: StumpWM broken commands? Date: Tue, 18 Dec 2018 12:18:28 +0100 Message-ID: <8736qvhym3.fsf@gnu.org> References: <878t0pqol1.fsf@dustycloud.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:45207) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gZDP7-0000sj-7O for bug-guix@gnu.org; Tue, 18 Dec 2018 06:19:13 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gZDOw-00036H-Jc for bug-guix@gnu.org; Tue, 18 Dec 2018 06:19:10 -0500 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:48409) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gZDOw-000360-FV for bug-guix@gnu.org; Tue, 18 Dec 2018 06:19:02 -0500 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1gZDOw-0003wT-4E for bug-guix@gnu.org; Tue, 18 Dec 2018 06:19:02 -0500 Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <878t0pqol1.fsf@dustycloud.org> (Christopher Lemmer Webber's message of "Sun, 16 Dec 2018 14:05:46 -0500") List-Id: Bug reports for GNU Guix List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-guix-bounces+gcggb-bug-guix=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "bug-Guix" To: Christopher Lemmer Webber Cc: 33772@debbugs.gnu.org Hi, Christopher Lemmer Webber skribis: > It seems to me that StumpWM broke somehow, for some reason. I can > confirm there was a version change: > > -sbcl-stumpwm@18.05:out /gnu/store/i0picr2xr2aq2a52nsaw67nvar1r3kh= w-sbcl-stumpwm-18.05 > +sbcl-stumpwm@18.11:out /gnu/store/6h2iln76dx8pxdp1hsaqb1yncm8vicz= j-sbcl-stumpwm-18.11 > > I am not sure if this is the cause or something else. At any rate, when > I try to run commands such as "gnew" (the command to make a new > group/workstation) I get back: > > Error In Command 'gnew': invalid number of arguments: 2 > > I though I'd try running the command manually and check the error, but > this also happens with eval! Some other commands are not affected. > > (I can try re-enabling the live REPL in StumpWM to play around with it, > but I currently have it off because they have the same live hacking > vulnerability in SBCL/SLIME that we had in Guile/Geiser some time ago.) Pierre, does that ring a bell? Others on the mailing list reported being happy with the upgrade, but maybe they use different bits of StumpWM. Thanks, Ludo=E2=80=99.