From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: =?utf-8?Q?Ludovic_Court=C3=A8s?= Subject: Re: Merging staging? Date: Wed, 09 Jan 2019 22:51:41 +0100 Message-ID: <8736q11ouq.fsf@gnu.org> References: <20181223140048.GE2581@macbook41> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:49868) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ghLlO-0005PP-GI for guix-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 09 Jan 2019 16:51:51 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ghLlN-0000SF-JM for guix-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 09 Jan 2019 16:51:50 -0500 Received: from hera.aquilenet.fr ([185.233.100.1]:57404) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ghLlN-0000ON-Br for guix-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 09 Jan 2019 16:51:49 -0500 In-Reply-To: <20181223140048.GE2581@macbook41> (Efraim Flashner's message of "Sun, 23 Dec 2018 16:00:48 +0200") List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-devel" To: Efraim Flashner Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org Hello! Efraim Flashner skribis: > On Thu, Dec 20, 2018 at 03:58:09PM +0100, Julien Lepiller wrote: >> Hi Guix, >>=20 >> I'd like to get staging merged soon, as it wasn't for quite some time. H= ere >> are some stats about the current state of substitutes for staging: >>=20 >> According to guix weather, we have: >>=20 >> | architecture | berlin | hydra | >> +--------------+--------+-------+ >> | x86_64 | 36.5% | 81.7% | >> | i686 | 23.8% | 71.0% | >> | aarch64 | 22.2% | 00.0% | >> | armhf | 17.0% | 45.6% | >>=20 >> What should the next step be? >>=20 > > I have two patches that I should be done with by the end of today, to > add some more flags to libdrm and mesa for armhf and aarch64. I can hold > on to it for later, or I can go ahead and push it when it's ready. It > shouldn't cause any rebuilds on x86_64 or i686. So what=E2=80=99s the status of this branch now, does anyone know? :-) Seriously though, we should do something about it. Ludo=E2=80=99.