From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Ricardo Wurmus Subject: bug#34565: ungoogled-chromium might contain remnants of Widevine DRM Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2019 08:59:00 +0100 Message-ID: <8736oivqkb.fsf@elephly.net> References: <1550547897.31222.1.camel@jxself.org> <20190219070601.GA8273@jasmine.lan> <1550582906.5431.7.camel@jxself.org> <20190219144342.GA2688@jasmine.lan> <1550623152.12316.5.camel@jxself.org> <1550625137.14138.3.camel@jxself.org> <20190220051536.GA7782@jasmine.lan> <1550640947.21795.7.camel@jxself.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:45240) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gwMnU-0002RW-3w for bug-guix@gnu.org; Wed, 20 Feb 2019 03:00:04 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gwMnS-0003MH-O8 for bug-guix@gnu.org; Wed, 20 Feb 2019 03:00:04 -0500 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:56385) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gwMnS-0003L7-F0 for bug-guix@gnu.org; Wed, 20 Feb 2019 03:00:02 -0500 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1gwMnS-0004Em-4H for bug-guix@gnu.org; Wed, 20 Feb 2019 03:00:02 -0500 Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-Message-ID: In-reply-to: <1550640947.21795.7.camel@jxself.org> List-Id: Bug reports for GNU Guix List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-guix-bounces+gcggb-bug-guix=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "bug-Guix" To: Jason Self Cc: 34565@debbugs.gnu.org Jason Self writes: > Leo Famulari wrote: >> To clarify this general point about Guix for anyone who is reading >> along, as a matter of policy the end user does not receive non-free >> source code from Guix. > > Right; the source is downloaded from commondatastorage.googleapis.com > but that is a technicality. What I'm saying is that the recipe should > be updated to cause it to download an already-cleaned up version > directly from Guix (it could be hosted somewhere on gnu.org for example > but exactly where can be up for negotiation) and that this excuse of > "they're getting it elsewhere" shouldn't be usable as an excuse to > sidestep the FSDG. It's still causing the user to download the software > due to the recipes provided by Guix. Please do not claim that Guix sidesteps or aims to sidestep the FSDG. This is not the case as we are committed to abiding by the FSDG. What users get when using =E2=80=9Cguix build --source=E2=80=9D is the proc= essed source code from the Guix build farm. The fallback is to fetch the original sources directly and process them (which is what the build farm does as well). -- Ricardo