From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Ricardo Wurmus Subject: bug#35529: libdrm fails to build on armhf-linux Date: Mon, 06 May 2019 13:06:18 +0200 Message-ID: <8736lrrget.fsf@elephly.net> References: <87d0l1n97o.fsf@netris.org> <87k1f8gl7k.fsf@elephly.net> <87imuosew7.fsf@netris.org> <874l68qcio.fsf@elephly.net> <8736lsq9ec.fsf@netris.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:56560) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hNezI-00034Q-E6 for bug-guix@gnu.org; Mon, 06 May 2019 10:53:05 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hNezH-0001XU-9e for bug-guix@gnu.org; Mon, 06 May 2019 10:53:04 -0400 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:43645) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hNezG-0001Wg-Kt for bug-guix@gnu.org; Mon, 06 May 2019 10:53:03 -0400 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hNezG-0000Zx-DI for bug-guix@gnu.org; Mon, 06 May 2019 10:53:02 -0400 Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-Message-ID: In-reply-to: <8736lsq9ec.fsf@netris.org> List-Id: Bug reports for GNU Guix List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-guix-bounces+gcggb-bug-guix=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "bug-Guix" To: Mark H Weaver Cc: 35529@debbugs.gnu.org Mark H Weaver writes: > Ricardo Wurmus writes: > >>> Ricardo Wurmus writes: >>> >>>> Mark H Weaver writes: >>>> >>>>> Hydra failed two consecutive attempts to build libdrm on armhf-linux: >>>>> >>>>> https://hydra.gnu.org/build/3481547#tabs-summary >>>>> >>>>> Both build attempts were made on hydra-slave2, which is a Wandboard Q= uad >>>>> based on the Freescale i.MX6 SOC. >>>> >>>> This has built fine on berlin. We have a completed build for >>>> /gnu/store/3c28p8b07709isd9jlcnnnyrpgz4ndz8-libdrm-2.4.97. >>> >>> What kind of hardware was it built on? >> >> I=E2=80=99m not sure. We=E2=80=99re using a few Overdrive 1000 machines= that have quite >> a bit more RAM than the other armhf nodes. > > Are there any other kinds of build slaves that build armhf binaries for > Berlin? Yes. We have a Beagleboard (x15.sjd.se), which is set up for 2 parallel builds and we use the Qemu service on 5 of our x86_64 machines to build for armhf. (We do the same for aarch64, but using 5 different nodes.) =E2=80=9Cnss=E2=80=9D failed its tests when built on x15.sjd.se, but it wor= ked fine when building on one of the Overdrives. -- Ricardo