From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Tobias Geerinckx-Rice via Bug reports for GNU Guix Subject: bug#38086: RAID installation script with =?UTF-8?Q?=E2=80=98mdadm=E2=80=99?= no longer works Date: Sun, 19 Jan 2020 23:31:41 +0100 Message-ID: <8736cbaxiq.fsf@nckx> References: <87sgn18g92.fsf@inria.fr> <877e46m1qd.fsf@gnu.org> <87r1zx902a.fsf@yucca> <87lfq4v3nb.fsf@gnu.org> <87h80sbexq.fsf@nckx> <87a76jqelv.fsf@gnu.org> Reply-To: Tobias Geerinckx-Rice Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature" Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:51468) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1itJ6x-0000jq-Uj for bug-guix@gnu.org; Sun, 19 Jan 2020 17:32:06 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1itJ6w-0003rX-Cw for bug-guix@gnu.org; Sun, 19 Jan 2020 17:32:03 -0500 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:38074) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1itJ6w-0003rR-AH for bug-guix@gnu.org; Sun, 19 Jan 2020 17:32:02 -0500 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1itJ6w-0006Hh-5Y for bug-guix@gnu.org; Sun, 19 Jan 2020 17:32:02 -0500 Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-Message-ID: In-reply-to: <87a76jqelv.fsf@gnu.org> List-Id: Bug reports for GNU Guix List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-guix-bounces+gcggb-bug-guix=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Sender: "bug-Guix" To: Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= Cc: 38086@debbugs.gnu.org --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Ludo', Ludovic Court=C3=A8s =E5=86=99=E9=81=93=EF=BC=9A >> Continue creating array? > > D=E2=80=99oh, I hadn=E2=80=99t seen that message. I doubt it was there for you to see in Guix's output. Things not=20 ending with a newline tend to get lost easily due to=20 line-buffering. Probably not worth worrying about. > =E2=80=9Cyes|=E2=80=9D works like a charm, I went this that. =E2=80=98Beautiful=E2=80=99, T G-R --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAEBCgAdFiEEfo+u0AlEeO9y5k0W2Imw8BjFSTwFAl4k2M0ACgkQ2Imw8BjF STweMRAAjp0HGqwVygVdx9JWuoS4lI3hoPZDOq1HSstInOaMbY+J8TAl7qccqOhy 15ziTZfOiYjYsLI0de8hDEA71LyDCtVvRQPCJrh0MCxrlkMmMTflua0NRh9sfMqE 4S58W9ftl2cBg+zI3BY5j31pdQkOfi1soYD3VZNII/a8JAt5z2mpLr6NyvyjxVR6 ZhsbzKVYEyfVDnGhCqbv9IguNdjnDCOfy18T37tJ/S+FCR6C1nZnB7HvJTyu59CK NWb5bFP5oj/IlGdBr1OxJCrUX2ks+VOjnUeTFX1WZxdRji96phHfDHR05dcfx502 oOt4JEVCQ9sfYJebHSHxEHRoIgFIq1CX3L114wRaURY0m2EwuksOZofJExeNtY3o 6weXO1R5e3ZBzTN2DCpQ8gALttj4KnPy24DGXL2JW7Vq7wuaoraeRLuj6eP1xkgl 1ik7gq46DDs2BH1AI0blkb79Kz1vfrbEuzpxQzOYiQpW8bgWO9A3VNaqAVEerLfN S6Dkx6XH91/MSTkZSD81jTOAH4Tbz/pDzUWtCrS7BMta9IfUrvNs4raEMyNk0gOi sfeebdAwQWCT//RjY4lIQ2r982Bkv/reC6xu8nuPDVg+qe0o7Ub78vgo1f247+2q IUmv003X3DBQI07Yuc7pRfpzcExcko0PhBkxhdXMLeb0ZdaRFgo= =jCNI -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=--