From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mp1 ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by ms11 with LMTPS id AHyLFu9VsF4lfAAA0tVLHw (envelope-from ) for ; Mon, 04 May 2020 17:50:39 +0000 Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by mp1 with LMTPS id cO0uI/pVsF67RAAAbx9fmQ (envelope-from ) for ; Mon, 04 May 2020 17:50:50 +0000 Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [IPv6:2001:470:142::17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7E2079420EB for ; Mon, 4 May 2020 17:50:48 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost ([::1]:50698 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jVfEu-0006y3-VH for larch@yhetil.org; Mon, 04 May 2020 13:50:48 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:60316) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jVfEC-0006X6-6J for guix-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 04 May 2020 13:50:04 -0400 Received: from mira.cbaines.net ([212.71.252.8]:59104) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jVfEB-0003YP-0H for guix-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 04 May 2020 13:50:03 -0400 Received: from localhost (unknown [46.237.174.129]) by mira.cbaines.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id CE38D27BBE1; Mon, 4 May 2020 18:50:00 +0100 (BST) Received: from localhost (localhost [local]) by localhost (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTPA id 6004d98b; Mon, 4 May 2020 17:49:58 +0000 (UTC) References: <87pnbxg508.fsf@devup.no> <87ftcimgir.fsf@cbaines.net> <87d07j1zts.fsf@devup.no> User-agent: mu4e 1.2.0; emacs 26.3 From: Christopher Baines To: Marius Bakke Subject: Re: core-updates call for testing In-reply-to: <87d07j1zts.fsf@devup.no> Date: Mon, 04 May 2020 18:49:56 +0100 Message-ID: <87368fmvy3.fsf@cbaines.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature" Received-SPF: pass client-ip=212.71.252.8; envelope-from=mail@cbaines.net; helo=mira.cbaines.net X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: First seen = 2020/05/04 13:50:01 X-ACL-Warn: Detected OS = Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] [fuzzy] X-Spam_score_int: -18 X-Spam_score: -1.9 X-Spam_bar: - X-Spam_report: (-1.9 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, UNPARSEABLE_RELAY=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001 autolearn=_AUTOLEARN X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: guix-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-devel" X-Scanner: scn0 X-Spam-Score: -3.11 Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=none; dmarc=none; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of guix-devel-bounces@gnu.org designates 2001:470:142::17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=guix-devel-bounces@gnu.org X-Scan-Result: default: False [-3.11 / 13.00]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; GENERIC_REPUTATION(0.00)[-0.49498857899041]; TO_DN_SOME(0.00)[]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip6:2001:470:142::/48:c]; IP_REPUTATION_HAM(0.00)[asn: 22989(0.13), country: US(-0.00), ip: 2001:470:142::17(-0.49)]; DWL_DNSWL_BLOCKED(0.00)[2001:470:142::17:from]; MX_GOOD(-0.50)[cached: eggs.gnu.org]; RCPT_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; MAILLIST(-0.20)[mailman]; SIGNED_PGP(-2.00)[]; FREEMAIL_TO(0.00)[fastmail.com]; FORGED_RECIPIENTS_MAILLIST(0.00)[]; RCVD_TLS_LAST(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_NA(0.00)[]; ASN(0.00)[asn:22989, ipnet:2001:470:142::/48, country:US]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[]; TAGGED_FROM(0.00)[larch=yhetil.org]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; RCVD_COUNT_FIVE(0.00)[6]; FROM_NEQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[mail@cbaines.net,guix-devel-bounces@gnu.org]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; URIBL_BLOCKED(0.00)[gnu.org:url,cbaines.net:email,fedoraproject.org:url,fastmail.com:email]; MIME_GOOD(-0.20)[multipart/signed,text/plain]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+,1:+,2:~]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[cbaines.net]; HAS_LIST_UNSUB(-0.01)[]; DNSWL_BLOCKED(0.00)[2001:470:142::17:from]; FORGED_SENDER_MAILLIST(0.00)[] X-TUID: c/ULcpPMG8Qs --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain Marius Bakke writes: > Christopher Baines writes: > >> Marius Bakke writes: >> >>> Please try upgrading your profiles and systems and file bugs for >>> anything that does not work for you. GNOME users in particular are >>> encouraged to try the new GNOME 3.34 and report any regressions. >> >> I did some testing today, I managed to upgrade my profile after I >> excluded flightgear, hplip and unknown-horizons (this fails to build on >> master as well). > > FlightGear is fairly outdated, I suspect that there are patches upstream > to allow building with the latest Boost. > >> I've got a patch to fix python-s3transfer [1]. >> >> 1: https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=41027 > > Oh, great that you brought it upstream. The change LGTM. Great, I've pushed this now as c63bd847816061e76389e93dc094df98800f081b. >> As for reconfiguring my system, I use hplip with the CUPS service, so >> that doesn't work. I did have a look at hplip but I got lost in the >> configure script. I did find something related to Fedora [2]. >> >> 2: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1706233 >> 3: https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/hplip/c/2268f0b1bdc4abce391458a5c90500d37ed438b6?branch=master > > I fixed hplip in commit 68c7f577d8cbb1a11a812e36c7ae1e34ccc57e62. I did > not look at these reports, so let me know if you think something else > should be done. Awesome, thanks :) >> The other issue I ran in to when trying to build my system was the >> channel/inferior I use for Linux didn't work. I've raised [4] regarding >> this. >> >> 4: https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=41028 > > I haven't looked into this, but is the inferior from before > commit 05e783871c2c69b402e088863d46f5be7915ac74? > > Not sure how we can provide backwards-compatibility in this case. Hmm, knowing that something changd around call-with-new-thread is useful. It would be good to figure this out prior to merging though, I can't be the only one using a inferior to load a revision of Guix from more than 2 months ago. There are also implications for things like the Guix Data Service that uses inferiors, as this issue would prevent using newer versions of Guix to load revisions older than the 19th of March. After getting a bit lost in the code, I did find more details on where the issue is occurring, and it looks like there's some support at least for using specific versions of Guile to get around issues running compute-guix-derivation [1], so hopefully this issue with Guile 3 is feasible to address in a backwards compatible way. 1: http://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/guix.git/tree/guix/channels.scm#n335 --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQKTBAEBCgB9FiEEPonu50WOcg2XVOCyXiijOwuE9XcFAl6wVcRfFIAAAAAALgAo aXNzdWVyLWZwckBub3RhdGlvbnMub3BlbnBncC5maWZ0aGhvcnNlbWFuLm5ldDNF ODlFRUU3NDU4RTcyMEQ5NzU0RTBCMjVFMjhBMzNCMEI4NEY1NzcACgkQXiijOwuE 9XcWTA/+OnoK1JGQTyHUB+dPo1ljxZxcjfG49GOn8smIVgCFdEpHnBsRCTIa3I81 8BIekJA+1aVyO2OfAASdD8MMI+Rfa89WPz3eMq8VIWob5hu79oq5jArAg35f+BdR kVfcSO8lkhZ1jHRPGGcz7C0YXTsuLUwpz6rzazpD+GIqNc94PAV/58tE3RMg3lbb ez1ifGaLHSpr/zHKmH2vLWDofJlgisFdN9ogL9mfV3zv1+Q/Xni/0IgzOIPp+mqv IipiRR3qQb4H7yvTR4Il8J6nBS+4dZe1Zec5T1ARi24qG32CWj2NMZtK6+eH+esx Weizc3yoNER3+39oO6Fa1fST6lTqXDDPPAIttea5thwjCeRbif7Hgb33jZCHxGcH G+gakjw8c/3xRKnJo9Ep2XLJb8wDUhF+6sovT3fSPTvmfk0+i9XSCaLvEYaA8Gvj yddoixmAXXrvSySPpscsA70TPJgBxG+o3A+JKug+KHrQ9hXPvLa9rO5AC/yM2II+ qh90g2ujw0tk2m3670fP3+DHFmZNsTrjX1N2PRq3NQXsb46ulLKlL8p0MRZcOX5w rTO1QFmlcLW6IU9uJfTP3Ee/P0Qvy+v/RfWZ8otyUZHV713kEPdyqyK8xKtW1cEF hKvSgg27sPgry/K2G78A7tcVQJ4DuZWXOoVL2EAaWmVownvmvaY= =XtEC -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=--