From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mp0 ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by ms11 with LMTPS id cJ/jB7PztF+uAQAA0tVLHw (envelope-from ) for ; Wed, 18 Nov 2020 10:13:07 +0000 Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by mp0 with LMTPS id 2OnQA7PztF+9CAAA1q6Kng (envelope-from ) for ; Wed, 18 Nov 2020 10:13:07 +0000 Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BF5D29402DD for ; Wed, 18 Nov 2020 10:13:06 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost ([::1]:46956 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kfKSX-0005cf-LN for larch@yhetil.org; Wed, 18 Nov 2020 05:13:05 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:48914) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kfKSL-0005cV-CH for guix-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 18 Nov 2020 05:12:53 -0500 Received: from mail-wm1-x344.google.com ([2a00:1450:4864:20::344]:40841) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kfKSJ-0002vM-89; Wed, 18 Nov 2020 05:12:53 -0500 Received: by mail-wm1-x344.google.com with SMTP id a3so2148773wmb.5; Wed, 18 Nov 2020 02:12:49 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=from:to:cc:subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id :user-agent:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=6NZTyRoMTKt5jW8Ga750a/8bEdZh5AfwWcnVObRt05I=; b=Umtovquxn4ukIvDorVCRNmLf8/+axrmMTA6ghpWjePqPtZDxTiiZMhaThl/x0bHL73 LNfAW8rakOGESHTerYY33p/ZqxMmG26nUGzaQADTn7r+2suXFYAwYJ6wCVwpMJRuqAVG xiIW+c4d1ZbOj679guTpSbf5LnCEtvaSyzBRqOv4vkviqvDhtnXTZDtBcgqhyzBvJld8 yJX411/FI8F027kTvKjR7taKvQfAkpKYIW4Z6ELX4ht13wqerGdkitQ8TNxJU/bzZY2U QtVU7OwPd+cq8x7bFuwW4V/P6/OmRc+SwY7kUKapp+TN/q/4nu+HYekVXGbfOLrFl63F XPZg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:references:date:in-reply-to :message-id:user-agent:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=6NZTyRoMTKt5jW8Ga750a/8bEdZh5AfwWcnVObRt05I=; b=o6TZOyEgTInPIXxLdR48qN3J6PaLGYZvxm7GAn0sA17GeZOrxRDJiMfrpAl+2LZJGS vVThxEbUmw+fTIf7ZL34nZVwWodDTPNQRx0ZA+z4TE2os5/oPe0X2w88fgG95wEwb5Ph Jl/Ubfc49lIbZczT9ZgZq8FzrHAXeHAI3n/PIz2ypAteZeubtt2rZqZ3fH0ZlO1rHtfy qvvOTXQ9R/j8osZGuWGsHPMlG4sttZ0xBG2ReGGPM9T0qEICteO8s77QWz++CRP5+/Ni uIZGqR0OE0/ktdZNEBjykJHuEzateb3xXcn480EWJMhXM6sTiVpuPPpCpwiygtcW7Tws rZCw== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532VSmIeD92i/6bOjZWQJVFKTKz4EHF/I/lu1v3dTvBUDV9mX+jp x6R5Y8ok9t0BC6uwNhbit1ofFjkMcevLQQ== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJywI8SnqRHnSoPii1JO9x5hHaia9IhLwDCO6Q56fZ5p9DymmA1q1GzdHkLrFFK0yKTb4BGQTQ== X-Received: by 2002:a1c:81d7:: with SMTP id c206mr3504161wmd.140.1605694368172; Wed, 18 Nov 2020 02:12:48 -0800 (PST) Received: from unfall (20.134.94.90.dynamic.jazztel.es. [90.94.134.20]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id e3sm16094723wro.90.2020.11.18.02.12.47 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Wed, 18 Nov 2020 02:12:47 -0800 (PST) From: =?utf-8?Q?Miguel_=C3=81ngel_Arruga_Vivas?= To: Maxim Cournoyer Subject: Re: [PATCH] Automatically set `geiser-guile-load-path' from .dir-locals References: <87tuuixjno.fsf@gmail.com> <87zh3w5ytp.fsf@dustycloud.org> <87wnz05u7d.fsf@dustycloud.org> <87tuu46tqm.fsf@gmail.com> <87lff3iueo.fsf@dustycloud.org> <87y2j2c4u1.fsf@gmail.com> <87r1otxsgc.fsf@gmail.com> <877dqlgpxf.fsf@dustycloud.org> <871rgtgoow.fsf@dustycloud.org> <87d00dvx2j.fsf@gmail.com> <87lff0atc3.fsf@gmail.com> Date: Wed, 18 Nov 2020 11:12:46 +0100 In-Reply-To: <87lff0atc3.fsf@gmail.com> (Maxim Cournoyer's message of "Tue, 17 Nov 2020 10:36:28 -0500") Message-ID: <873617ug69.fsf@gmail.com> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.1 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Received-SPF: pass client-ip=2a00:1450:4864:20::344; envelope-from=rosen644835@gmail.com; helo=mail-wm1-x344.google.com X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: No matching host in p0f cache. That's all we know. X-Spam_score_int: -17 X-Spam_score: -1.8 X-Spam_bar: - X-Spam_report: (-1.8 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT=0.25, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: guix-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-devel" X-Scanner: ns3122888.ip-94-23-21.eu Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=fail (headers rsa verify failed) header.d=gmail.com header.s=20161025 header.b=Umtovqux; dmarc=fail reason="SPF not aligned (relaxed)" header.from=gmail.com (policy=none); spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of guix-devel-bounces@gnu.org designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=guix-devel-bounces@gnu.org X-Spam-Score: 0.09 X-TUID: /ejmZjubaNrB Hello Maxim, Maxim Cournoyer writes: > Hello Miguel, > > Miguel =C3=81ngel Arruga Vivas writes: > >> Hi! >> >> Christopher Lemmer Webber writes: >> [...] >>> It sounds like you're already putting together the work to do it. If >>> you don't mind doing it that would save me a lot of time right >>> now... I'm quite swamped! I'd be very grateful! >> >> No problem, I just didn't want to end up with two reports for the same >> issue. It's already open as . > > Woo! That was quick! Well, I wouldn't call it quick, as I wanted to pin-point at least the issue, but it took me a long time to even trim the reproducer. Christopher mail really was a heads up to at least report the bug to Emacs people. > I've tested the repro script and could reproduce for the first time (the > steps must be followed scrupulously otherwise just changing buffer can > cause the bad behavior to disappear)! Thank you for the confirmation. > Thank you for the efficiency with which you handled the issue, it's much > appreciated. You're welcome. Nonetheless, I wish I already had a solution... :-( Happy hacking! Miguel