From: "Ludovic Courtès" <ludo@gnu.org>
To: Attila Lendvai <attila@lendvai.name>
Cc: 54836@debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: [bug#54836] [PATCH 1/2] http-client: Fix redirection.
Date: Wed, 27 Apr 2022 22:53:26 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <8735hyjlix.fsf@gnu.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <TEOfd1QUBofS5gzJHP15SC0Lq_iRfWnto0m99ZpFBNJYGIc41qK2tR79kaOhzZPSV_r-EYJdlDJ7Ib8rRO3OJYN_6wNtqTrPZvFwm-1i53E=@lendvai.name> (Attila Lendvai's message of "Tue, 12 Apr 2022 07:28:33 +0000")
Hi,
And sorry for the delay.
Attila Lendvai <attila@lendvai.name> skribis:
>> > It's not enough to just handle the thrown exception, because we need to be
>> > able to get hold of the fetched content, too.
>>
>> Would it make sense, then, to use the lower-level ‘http-get’ from (web
>> client)? That would let the code deal with all the HTTP idiosyncrasies.
>
>
> i think it boils down to this trade-off:
>
> 1) keep http-fetch simpler, at the expense of reimplementing parts of
> it in the go importer (e.g. the redirection logic)
>
> 2) add this extra complexity to http-fetch, and avoid the extra
> complexity of a local, potentially half-assed %http-fetch in the go
> importer.
>
> 3) something else i'm not aware of
For now, I’m somewhat in favor of #1.
My take would be: try to implement whatever’s needed specifically for
the Go importer; from there, we can eventually revisit that situation
and maybe switch to something that’s more like #2.
How does that sound?
Thanks,
Ludo’.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-04-27 20:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-04-10 13:34 [bug#54836] [PATCH 1/2] http-client: Fix redirection Attila Lendvai
2022-04-10 13:35 ` [bug#54836] [PATCH 2/2] http-client: Factor out open-connection*, rename variables Attila Lendvai
2022-04-10 13:41 ` [bug#54836] [PATCH v2 1/3] http-client: Added accept-all-response-codes? argument Attila Lendvai
2022-04-10 13:41 ` [bug#54836] [PATCH 2/3] http-client: Fix redirection Attila Lendvai
2022-04-11 12:44 ` [bug#54836] [PATCH 1/2] " Ludovic Courtès
2022-04-10 13:41 ` [bug#54836] [PATCH 3/3] http-client: Factor out open-connection*, rename variables Attila Lendvai
2022-04-11 12:45 ` [bug#54836] [PATCH 1/2] http-client: Fix redirection Ludovic Courtès
2022-04-12 7:28 ` Attila Lendvai
2022-04-27 16:37 ` Attila Lendvai
2022-04-27 20:53 ` Ludovic Courtès [this message]
2023-01-03 22:29 ` Maxim Cournoyer
2022-04-28 10:22 ` [bug#54836] [PATCH v3] http-client: Factor out open-connection*, rename variables Attila Lendvai
2023-01-06 18:46 ` [bug#54836] [PATCH v4 1/2] " Attila Lendvai
2023-01-06 18:46 ` [bug#54836] [PATCH v4 2/2] http-client: Added accept-all-response-codes? argument Attila Lendvai
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=8735hyjlix.fsf@gnu.org \
--to=ludo@gnu.org \
--cc=54836@debbugs.gnu.org \
--cc=attila@lendvai.name \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this external index
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/guix.git
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.