From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mp10.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by ms5.migadu.com with LMTPS id +TPtFiMHjmNcDwEAbAwnHQ (envelope-from ) for ; Mon, 05 Dec 2022 15:58:43 +0100 Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by mp10.migadu.com with LMTPS id EBWFFCMHjmPJ/QAAG6o9tA (envelope-from ) for ; Mon, 05 Dec 2022 15:58:43 +0100 Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0EF8F3EAD6 for ; Mon, 5 Dec 2022 15:58:42 +0100 (CET) Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1p2CvH-0004uV-Bz; Mon, 05 Dec 2022 09:58:23 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1p2CvF-0004se-QK for guix-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 05 Dec 2022 09:58:21 -0500 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1p2CvD-0003xc-PN; Mon, 05 Dec 2022 09:58:19 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnu.org; s=fencepost-gnu-org; h=MIME-Version:In-Reply-To:Date:References:Subject:To: From; bh=/cufAYH8Ol5Bltaq+fySAzdzdEYN/kLS/kxMfWzTFyE=; b=jwo6QiYNEDdCcRljTs8W FdCRvlZDyVv1v59G8p2Eag3ZMyd1X/RFKeHHRDpinDgmbUgfrLaBpbhGT+p4XoyNVLrQO+7Rbf84k cMYW6DboX4vgEo1m2H9M4CGQ01jOjMz5y8r6aEeCh0N1bJVT38qovFEnzO62x4ktWpbK89brXlCP2 Aedo1mOpBtwTT0RVelCLjtapazLf05a6+AMtQpNSpe9pLrMtLxBw2v4IBaEr9xrNAZOvemOV0vkNp lYoa6qO5JpS5O4NFG4eZjZmVp/SEmEWP9C7qmyfu0JOpKzhjZpOiU1F4+Md+nhEL6hhGwsgcMTXdf LgeaeyP8/wnRTg==; Received: from [2001:660:6102:320:e120:2c8f:8909:cdfe] (helo=ribbon) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1p2CvD-0002Dz-34; Mon, 05 Dec 2022 09:58:19 -0500 From: =?utf-8?Q?Ludovic_Court=C3=A8s?= To: Vagrant Cascadian Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org Subject: Re: Guile-Gcrypt 0.4.0 released References: <87r0xjyywc.fsf@gnu.org> <877cz8p0mj.fsf@contorta> X-URL: http://www.fdn.fr/~lcourtes/ X-Revolutionary-Date: Quintidi 15 Frimaire an 231 de la =?utf-8?Q?R=C3=A9v?= =?utf-8?Q?olution=2C?= jour du Chevreuil X-PGP-Key-ID: 0x090B11993D9AEBB5 X-PGP-Key: http://www.fdn.fr/~lcourtes/ludovic.asc X-PGP-Fingerprint: 3CE4 6455 8A84 FDC6 9DB4 0CFB 090B 1199 3D9A EBB5 X-OS: x86_64-pc-linux-gnu Date: Mon, 05 Dec 2022 15:58:17 +0100 In-Reply-To: <877cz8p0mj.fsf@contorta> (Vagrant Cascadian's message of "Sat, 03 Dec 2022 14:45:40 -0800") Message-ID: <87359trj7a.fsf@gnu.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.2 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-BeenThere: guix-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org Sender: guix-devel-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org X-Migadu-Flow: FLOW_IN X-Migadu-Country: US ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yhetil.org; s=key1; t=1670252323; h=from:from:sender:sender:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date: message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version: content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references:list-id:list-help: list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-post:dkim-signature; bh=/cufAYH8Ol5Bltaq+fySAzdzdEYN/kLS/kxMfWzTFyE=; b=sVnG7KymI9+oKX49TdQJmELWIfvoUcxElxjvGRg6AguEQ8RtvDhbJUxYnn1VjfmyZ8aqlW CdYJa1Ile1j/+9b+ZI0GS2PvzJ1mRYgwmNpYIvtLWDZrN+j3gUOjaivMpCker8YO8V4jEx de+uMYsy9LPpU7gLUOXZ511wI7yNRzrrjegCNTk5jUwADVoQjByGQZsfvZN+K11h9WbMuY VCt5pJJwBWiW28u/3r9Y1TkfRQyiZQWft2DnfrSciqOJ0DAU/mpsfc0D6lAgO+rY+XDV3w H1mK+nwSPmKuifnpT9AIAh0Sx2fWB2xo8kjTi3Fx3jI7nx7BG3PAQymZraDrVg== ARC-Seal: i=1; s=key1; d=yhetil.org; t=1670252323; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; b=Irbkwfzoz/7yeVBCKsB5dC1pmGzz1DozJFAty2v/IJVf9aW3RGGjVo79UjrLMOfSe2SIqu OWgFgEUUNs2Z5a4tmYoxbGo+lT0ZSLFLFHcgugn4Pn49esaGKCkttQhevyOZO5LXzzdETH DMcKzHy1xV7NDkA6TjO44QR95NabS2x+dD4EGd+MwneMIFS8UtcfpzLBF9nP+thr6KQhHf hyUigXRBKUf9fbqi6by2rwT9bPfNgaI3luGcdBNaJDYHHxDyjkAcTGgQ982A6m+IDio6f8 7onB24SxZdcaACN+jLJHZjDjX3VjK6gNzow7k3Wt2zrkYa07Sp4g/UjlXPqpPA== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=pass header.d=gnu.org header.s=fencepost-gnu-org header.b=jwo6QiYN; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=gnu.org; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of "guix-devel-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="guix-devel-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" X-Migadu-Spam-Score: -5.17 Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=pass header.d=gnu.org header.s=fencepost-gnu-org header.b=jwo6QiYN; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=gnu.org; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of "guix-devel-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="guix-devel-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" X-Migadu-Queue-Id: 0EF8F3EAD6 X-Spam-Score: -5.17 X-Migadu-Scanner: scn0.migadu.com X-TUID: uohn/8EWqESC Hi, Vagrant Cascadian skribis: > FWIW, I updated guile-gcrypt to 0.4.0 in Debian experimental and updated > to guix 1.4.0rc1 in Debian experimental using guile-gcrypt 0.4.0, and it > seemed to go fine so far... > > https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=3Dguile-gcrypt&suite=3De= xperimental > https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=3Dguix&suite=3Dexperimen= tal Yay, thanks! > I'm guessing guile-gcrypt 0.4.0 will not land in the soon-to-be-released > guix 1.4.0 once it is released, though? No, but it doesn=E2=80=99t matter much because there are very few differenc= es. > Looking at the longer term, makes me wonder if I should build guix with > guile-gcrypt 0.3.0 currently in Debian unstable & testing ... or if > 0.4.0 is a small enough difference that it will probably be fine to > build guix 1.4.0* against it (and eventually migrate it to debian > unstable and eventually testing)? Either way is fine. > I know the guix thing would be to package all the relevent versions, but > that is a bit trickier in Debian! :) Heheh. :-) Ludo=E2=80=99.