From: "Ludovic Courtès" <ludo@gnu.org>
To: Maxim Cournoyer <maxim.cournoyer@gmail.com>
Cc: Florian Pelz <pelzflorian@pelzflorian.de>, 72840@debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: [bug#72840] [PATCH RFC] DRAFT doc: Add “Deprecation Policy” section.
Date: Wed, 11 Sep 2024 12:11:53 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <8734m67b4m.fsf_-_@gnu.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <8734m63c4f.fsf@gmail.com> (Maxim Cournoyer's message of "Wed, 11 Sep 2024 16:04:00 +0900")
Hello,
Maxim Cournoyer <maxim.cournoyer@gmail.com> skribis:
> Thanks for taking the time to write this down. It'll be useful to many
> I'm sure, including myself.
>
> Apart from the small things I've spotted above, it looks like a pretty
> good starting ground for a deprecation policy.
Coolio. I’ve sent v3 fixing the typos you reported.
Let’s wait for another week or so to give people a chance to comment.
> One thought I'm having right now is that it would be cool if all these
> deprecation mechanism offered in the (guix deprecation) module were
> fully documented in our manual, and could be referred to from the above
> section/text for extra information; but this can be done in the future.
Right. At least ‘deprecated-package’, ‘define-deprecated’, etc. will
now have an index entry.
Thanks for taking the time to comment!
Ludo’.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-09-11 10:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-08-27 19:13 [bug#72839] [PATCH RFC] DRAFT doc: Add “Deprecation Policy” section Ludovic Courtès
2024-09-02 11:53 ` [bug#72840] " pelzflorian (Florian Pelz)
2024-09-05 21:26 ` bug#72840: " Ludovic Courtès
2024-09-05 21:31 ` [bug#72840] [PATCH RFC v2] " Ludovic Courtès
2024-09-11 7:04 ` Maxim Cournoyer
2024-09-11 10:11 ` [bug#72840] [PATCH RFC v3] " Ludovic Courtès
2024-09-12 0:40 ` Maxim Cournoyer
2024-09-11 10:11 ` Ludovic Courtès [this message]
2024-09-11 18:30 ` [bug#72840] [PATCH RFC] DRAFT " Noé Lopez via Guix-patches via
2024-09-13 17:23 ` Ludovic Courtès
2024-09-11 19:49 ` [bug#72840] Deprecation policy Konrad Hinsen
2024-09-13 17:32 ` [bug#72840] [PATCH RFC] DRAFT doc: Add “Deprecation Policy” section Ludovic Courtès
2024-09-15 8:22 ` Konrad Hinsen
[not found] ` <66e1e26e.050a0220.2c8e9.9533SMTPIN_ADDED_BROKEN@mx.google.com>
2024-09-12 15:39 ` Greg Hogan
2024-09-13 16:41 ` [bug#72839] Using RFC process? (was Re: [bug#72839] [PATCH RFC] DRAFT doc: Add “Deprecation Policy” section.) Simon Tournier
2024-09-13 17:38 ` [bug#72840] [PATCH RFC] DRAFT doc: Add “Deprecation Policy” section Ludovic Courtès
2024-09-13 18:11 ` [bug#72839] bug#72840: " Simon Tournier
2024-09-13 20:57 ` [bug#72840] " indieterminacy
2024-09-17 12:21 ` [bug#72840] Orphaned packages Konrad Hinsen
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2024-09-13 17:44 Input welcome on the proposed deprecation policy Ludovic Courtès
2024-09-14 7:14 ` [bug#72840] [PATCH RFC] DRAFT doc: Add “Deprecation Policy” section Janneke Nieuwenhuizen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=8734m67b4m.fsf_-_@gnu.org \
--to=ludo@gnu.org \
--cc=72840@debbugs.gnu.org \
--cc=maxim.cournoyer@gmail.com \
--cc=pelzflorian@pelzflorian.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this external index
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/guix.git
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.