From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mp1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:403:58f0::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by ms13.migadu.com with LMTPS id kDFWAXKfYGeqlAAA62LTzQ:P1 (envelope-from ) for ; Mon, 16 Dec 2024 21:45:22 +0000 Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:403:58f0::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by mp1.migadu.com with LMTPS id kDFWAXKfYGeqlAAA62LTzQ (envelope-from ) for ; Mon, 16 Dec 2024 22:45:22 +0100 X-Envelope-To: larch@yhetil.org Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=pass header.d=debbugs.gnu.org header.s=debbugs-gnu-org header.b=lMUKYpPh; dkim=fail ("headers rsa verify failed") header.d=gnu.org header.s=fencepost-gnu-org header.b="eh3ps/zz"; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of "guix-patches-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="guix-patches-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org"; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=gnu.org ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yhetil.org; s=key1; t=1734385521; h=from:from:sender:sender:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date: message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version: content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding:resent-cc: resent-from:resent-sender:resent-message-id:in-reply-to:in-reply-to: references:references:list-id:list-help:list-unsubscribe: list-subscribe:list-post:dkim-signature; bh=eAKtMczlXrnbHOs54agqv1rRsq0Ekp5CL6J2gqtePyo=; b=PLOoM42FQ2FfuhBCNZQOQRvMKpFDtFbEgKkKZjTJuLH22lBnE+NqXcHFE7dcsMvXiGFVKH uAOqlCfUKH5Mdz8ePTRYqrRE6JG6XIlFCaPXsgfhwul6qztwPT4vrh0bwDBsmaTPR6IHA8 4pkzL63FwQod9X74oHiXdzuZ13xPM2OLEvW4oF5SfR9RlDWbwZp2+6+PgZBH2bzErWLksO 8itYt/CXT97wiDGdgpkfsnhfW3dysiOdnLYAk+eigiZndYVt3zfH/9NAGOGEJXQYwKBjTw Oue08Xo4Pq/Zb1wutDkE6vP5dk+0l/i19BV7Fq+OSbQYdIvf8o8mL+gXJmq5KA== ARC-Seal: i=1; s=key1; d=yhetil.org; t=1734385521; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; b=RWqmbd+5O6F0Zm19z+e73BTxCa7ynrEJwZKmI0YqlGIgR4Y6yMuY5UP5KF3xl7COODjcKh GtmCIm0MdMB3T1cEZ46DnxJrjBSryxvdGCQ+s6bpZGf0f6Q8/xV9F19xkrGyLGrXxrgnwV uoQZzcTZGTMRspxbGzDLc2WRpxlIySAqpCf3uImeMbjM85rTabjEZHcxMmML41jg4KCxVk W2Ao5GKcdFR/AN6m/9x95XbYC0DH1G6ASzbPHJmtoq73IOx7uTyXuI1xfpyUzNesoW1Aa0 fMA6CUtp2TihwnzHSkL+aClPzZIBMMB/jHlBPhBVVwXnVMOmrv2NAaNKwibP/Q== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=pass header.d=debbugs.gnu.org header.s=debbugs-gnu-org header.b=lMUKYpPh; dkim=fail ("headers rsa verify failed") header.d=gnu.org header.s=fencepost-gnu-org header.b="eh3ps/zz"; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of "guix-patches-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="guix-patches-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org"; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=gnu.org Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A6C307D50B for ; Mon, 16 Dec 2024 22:45:20 +0100 (CET) Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1tNIto-0000aY-S3; Mon, 16 Dec 2024 16:45:08 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1tNItl-0000YG-3T for guix-patches@gnu.org; Mon, 16 Dec 2024 16:45:05 -0500 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:5::43]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1tNItj-00058X-I7 for guix-patches@gnu.org; Mon, 16 Dec 2024 16:45:04 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=debbugs.gnu.org; s=debbugs-gnu-org; h=MIME-Version:Date:References:In-Reply-To:From:To:Subject; bh=eAKtMczlXrnbHOs54agqv1rRsq0Ekp5CL6J2gqtePyo=; b=lMUKYpPhlGHcbQ6tOHrpTdCH5pjzQsPkilhDqFDUZEmjysk2InAZ02wu1puDM7RhPdEnsdLQGt+uT4Hx5nx2daAsHzKpDUAUF02mIfNevBr3G8g/q3eX6kXIT3GKh/xsZVYjz12vKGFENSCx6xECrv4bxzZpGuKzw9/1bbhYdCCa04uU/WWKIctr1ezeKnp1+eiJd/cTNCs9T5JpL03CVv+Fm0P/aAgLtPzUAGfC/24KvzIH5+Y2nZGv5ib7G4gSbRe02CEINz0tsbkdxDzlkN9u1+nVMWX7+jeJKUsOsBQ66yKoCYRihCZIalgxCD46OK25vvIuq7Cm+1ZBFHNgWg==; Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1tNIti-0003U1-CH for guix-patches@gnu.org; Mon, 16 Dec 2024 16:45:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: [bug#74676] [core-packages-team 5/5] DRAFT gnu: gcc: Update gcc, gcc-toolchain to 14. Resent-From: Janneke Nieuwenhuizen Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: guix-patches@gnu.org Resent-Date: Mon, 16 Dec 2024 21:45:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 74676 X-GNU-PR-Package: guix-patches X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: 74676@debbugs.gnu.org Cc: Andreas Enge , Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= , Efraim Flashner , Ekaitz Zarraga X-Debbugs-Original-To: guix-patches@gnu.org Received: via spool by submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B.173438545313295 (code B ref -1); Mon, 16 Dec 2024 21:45:02 +0000 Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 16 Dec 2024 21:44:13 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:56548 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1tNIsv-0003SM-Fu for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 16 Dec 2024 16:44:13 -0500 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]:53350) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1tNIss-0003SA-7h for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 16 Dec 2024 16:44:11 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1tNIsq-0000Oc-U1 for guix-patches@gnu.org; Mon, 16 Dec 2024 16:44:09 -0500 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1tNIsk-0004x4-5R; Mon, 16 Dec 2024 16:44:02 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnu.org; s=fencepost-gnu-org; h=MIME-Version:Date:References:In-Reply-To:Subject:To: From; bh=eAKtMczlXrnbHOs54agqv1rRsq0Ekp5CL6J2gqtePyo=; b=eh3ps/zzv/e2KYbzG7Mt QZ1yQ810slPPsMIXUBwhsOiK3tapvyyS6XkbUUFyjqyjDuaIdI0nj6X3EEMticZghk3Vp4lxi/Cq4 KERVqdav40fYcex2XLuEM2LCpf0ibr2Ss6WSzn4gPufFyFjYNIE5vINPaIfbU3US+lO7n5OVfuXY0 ZBWlbMbWn1RMxrlV/0U57CJ5CErk6TyDFnLvznV3YummipbWhIscMp+VaDerjbkSNHp+KShY/g/y8 JWK6eqw9SIPXr1pqL1KCpJnvA+iKI7kl61KXGJ2lKn1MFUgIIcW9R13jGuVYGWeuPTVHxrrF85P12 1bMsNrQa0nC/xg==; From: Janneke Nieuwenhuizen In-Reply-To: <87ldwqavrf.fsf@gnu.org> (Janneke Nieuwenhuizen's message of "Sun, 08 Dec 2024 19:13:08 +0100") Organization: AvatarAcademy.nl References: <87ed2ofpbo.fsf@gnu.org> <87ttbh52xh.fsf@gnu.org> <87ldwqavrf.fsf@gnu.org> X-Url: http://AvatarAcademy.nl Date: Mon, 16 Dec 2024 22:43:53 +0100 Message-ID: <8734in717q.fsf@gnu.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: guix-patches@gnu.org List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-patches-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org Sender: guix-patches-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org X-Migadu-Flow: FLOW_IN X-Migadu-Country: US X-Migadu-Spam-Score: -4.39 X-Spam-Score: -4.39 X-Migadu-Queue-Id: A6C307D50B X-Migadu-Scanner: mx11.migadu.com X-TUID: jOhPIjCC4hDN Janneke Nieuwenhuizen writes: Hello, >>> So, I've just built "hello" for x86_64-linux on "core-packages-team" >>> (yay!) mostly re-using gcc-14 patches/workarounds that I created for the >>> Hurd. >> >> [..] >> >> I've all but reconfigured--guix system reconfigure > > That was apparently not true, somewhere in the process I somehow built fr= om > another branch. Anyway, still making good progress.... :-/ > > On IRC, Efraim reports that i686-linux and aarch64-linux fail to build > hello on current core-packages-team. That makes me reconsider whether > this strategy > >> I kept the scope narrow: x86_64-linux, because it has proven to be >> very hard to predict what's needed on other architectures. > > which makes a lot of sense for patches that go to "master" is a good > strategy for core-packages-team. Possibly it's better to use an > unlimited scope? Oh well. The current core-packages-team uses the gcc and bash fixes for all platforms and now also supports building all gcc versions from 4.8 and up, and I've just built hello again for x86_64-linux. I've built the rust bootstrap several times already, guess I'll just go for a new round. But this time we can maybeu "cheat" with packages that are too difficult to build, and build them with another gcc version than 14? Greetings, Janneke --=20 Janneke Nieuwenhuizen | GNU LilyPond https://LilyPond.org Freelance IT https://www.JoyOfSource.com | Avatar=C2=AE https://AvatarAcade= my.com