From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic =?utf-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?=)
Subject: Re: [PATCH] emacs: devel: Add indentation rules.
Date: Wed, 14 Oct 2015 22:00:29 +0200
Message-ID: <871tcxqkyq.fsf@gnu.org>
References: <871tdm6i0i.fsf@gmail.com> <8737y28fss.fsf@gnu.org>
	<87d1x57yhg.fsf@gmail.com> <87si5zwqqu.fsf@gnu.org>
	<878u7qybjn.fsf_-_@gmail.com> <87r3lhxchs.fsf@gnu.org>
	<87d1wyqoqw.fsf@gmail.com> <87wpv6l1d8.fsf@gnu.org>
	<87h9m9xwsf.fsf@gmail.com> <87a8s1e8mg.fsf@gnu.org>
	<87y4f8bfdn.fsf_-_@gmail.com> <87ziznqey0.fsf@gnu.org>
	<87h9lur732.fsf@gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Return-path: <guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:47961)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <ludo@gnu.org>) id 1ZmSDz-0003zR-3f
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 14 Oct 2015 16:00:38 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <ludo@gnu.org>) id 1ZmSDv-0002of-TS
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 14 Oct 2015 16:00:35 -0400
In-Reply-To: <87h9lur732.fsf@gmail.com> (Alex Kost's message of "Tue, 13 Oct
	2015 20:50:25 +0300")
List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution."
	<guix-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/guix-devel>,
	<mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:guix-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guix-devel>,
	<mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
To: Alex Kost <alezost@gmail.com>
Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org

Alex Kost <alezost@gmail.com> skribis:

> As we are talking about it, there are a couple of workarounds in the
> elisp code for the issues that were solved in Geiser 0.8.  So I would
> like to get rid of them and mention in the manual that Geiser 0.8 is
> required.  Apparently it shouldn't be done right now as it is too fast.
> But how long should we wait?  Would a month be enough time, or maybe
> wait until the next Geiser release?

I would wait for at least a couple of releases.  It might be worth
checking which version the major dist^W^W the other major distros ship
before making a decision.

Ludo=E2=80=99.