From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic =?utf-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?=)
Subject: Re: Two packages are called =?utf-8?Q?=E2=80=98python-wrapper?=
	=?utf-8?Q?=E2=80=99?=
Date: Mon, 21 Dec 2015 14:28:23 +0100
Message-ID: <871tagnd6w.fsf@gnu.org>
References: <CAKrPhPOzxoc-=52nzTQ1D5szJgtS=KZdOvXF2b+WM-6mrsU05Q@mail.gmail.com>
	<87vb7srbji.fsf@gnu.org>
	<CAKrPhPPHKUZtr03fQvn1DCh2iUtrgvdNGmLUApEp2Xc2ThT1TQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<87h9jcnkgd.fsf_-_@gnu.org>
	<CAKrPhPNnK4cQ+rbmTrUKE2w-0Vk5EqcmvQzcO5fkm5KNpXHSww@mail.gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Return-path: <guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:39106)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <ludo@gnu.org>) id 1aB0Vq-0001HB-8Y
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 21 Dec 2015 08:28:31 -0500
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <ludo@gnu.org>) id 1aB0Vm-0006dV-8d
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 21 Dec 2015 08:28:30 -0500
In-Reply-To: <CAKrPhPNnK4cQ+rbmTrUKE2w-0Vk5EqcmvQzcO5fkm5KNpXHSww@mail.gmail.com>
	(Federico Beffa's message of "Mon, 21 Dec 2015 12:09:00 +0100")
List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution."
	<guix-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/guix-devel>,
	<mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:guix-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guix-devel>,
	<mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
To: Federico Beffa <beffa@ieee.org>
Cc: Guix-devel <guix-devel@gnu.org>

Federico Beffa <beffa@ieee.org> skribis:

> On Mon, Dec 21, 2015 at 11:51 AM, Ludovic Court=C3=A8s <ludo@gnu.org> wro=
te:
>> In the meantime, I would recommend using -e to unambiguously refer to
>> the right wrapper.  Otherwise, we could come up with workarounds, such
>> as keeping the =E2=80=98python-minimal-wrapper=E2=80=99 private.
>
> Isn't 'python-minimal' just for bootstrapping? If that's the case, I
> would keep it private (but fix the name anyway).

The problem is that it=E2=80=99s used in other modules.  So if we make it
private, we=E2=80=99ll have to use

  (@@ (gnu packages python) python-minimal-wrapper)

there.

Ludo=E2=80=99.