From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic =?utf-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?=) Subject: Re: OpenSSL =?utf-8?B?4oCcRFJPV07igJ0=?= vulnerability & grafts Date: Sat, 05 Mar 2016 22:51:00 +0100 Message-ID: <871t7o386z.fsf@gnu.org> References: <87twkpnbk0.fsf@gnu.org> <20160302184308.GA11131@debian-netbook> <87ziugd0jw.fsf@gnu.org> <20160303084548.01fa0130@debian-netbook> <87d1r94yic.fsf@gnu.org> <20160305190735.GA22021@debian-netbook> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:52759) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1acK6M-0008TV-FJ for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 05 Mar 2016 16:51:07 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1acK6J-0007gc-59 for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 05 Mar 2016 16:51:06 -0500 In-Reply-To: <20160305190735.GA22021@debian-netbook> (Efraim Flashner's message of "Sat, 5 Mar 2016 21:07:35 +0200") List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Efraim Flashner Cc: guix-devel Efraim Flashner skribis: > On Sat, Mar 05, 2016 at 12:24:59AM +0100, Ludovic Court=C3=A8s wrote: >> Efraim Flashner skribis: >>=20 >> > efraim@debian-netbook:~/workspace/guix$ time ./pre-inst-env guix packa= ge -u && time ./pre-inst-env guix package -u && time ./pre-inst-env guix pa= ckage -u >> > >> > real 15m0.833s >> > user 5m53.268s >> > sys 1m26.056s >> > >> > real 14m27.095s >> > user 5m50.848s >> > sys 1m25.156s >> > >> > real 14m37.017s >> > user 5m55.564s >> > sys 1m30.536s >> > >> > so I don't think the substitute info is the part that's slowing it dow= n. >> > Conky shows me both guix hand guix-daemon working, so more likely some= thing >> > else, like figuring out the substitutions. >>=20 >> Terrible. Commit d4da602 should improve the situation. You=E2=80=99re = welcome >> to try again and report back! >>=20 > > Much better! Good, thanks for benchmarking! There are other things (=E2=80=98bag-grafts=E2=80=99, namely) that are done= repeatedly when doing an upgrade and that would benefit from a bit of caching/memoization. Coming next! Ludo=E2=80=99.