From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Christopher Allan Webber Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] licenses: Add beerware license. Date: Sat, 26 Mar 2016 18:50:53 -0700 Message-ID: <871t6w3czm.fsf@dustycloud.org> References: <83dc458a779ea4c3d3c9a08d5d5a4a8420e98b31.1459033650.git.leo@famulari.name> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:40335) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ajzr0-0006bb-5r for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 26 Mar 2016 21:50:59 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ajzqx-0001ST-1Q for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 26 Mar 2016 21:50:58 -0400 Received: from dustycloud.org ([50.116.34.160]:34830) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ajzqw-0001SP-TA for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 26 Mar 2016 21:50:54 -0400 In-reply-to: <83dc458a779ea4c3d3c9a08d5d5a4a8420e98b31.1459033650.git.leo@famulari.name> List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Leo Famulari Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org Leo Famulari writes: > +(define beerware > + (license "Beerware" > + "http://people.freebsd.org/~phk/" ; Scroll down > + "https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing/Beerware")) > + Now there's a license name bound to cause some confusion! It looks free... I think it would be okay to push. But maybe if only one or two packages use it it would be better to just use the non-copyleft license option?