From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Alex Kost Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] gnu: Add ledger. Date: Mon, 16 May 2016 18:03:09 +0300 Message-ID: <871t52qc42.fsf@gmail.com> References: <1462648816.1139014.601038209.3A886EEC@webmail.messagingengine.com> <20160507222330.GA16592@jasmine> <1462673448.1215366.601202601.6F8B62D7@webmail.messagingengine.com> <20160509033906.GC25977@jasmine> <8737prou9x.fsf@gnu.org> <20160509210103.GB15057@jasmine> <1463023686.3455318.605409553.05451A73@webmail.messagingengine.com> <878tzf1vxu.fsf@gmail.com> <1463070674.3638408.605951137.5C3DB897@webmail.messagingengine.com> <87posp7oqa.fsf@gmail.com> <20160514024937.GA15206@jasmine> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:50281) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1b2K3A-0004X2-Vb for guix-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 16 May 2016 11:03:17 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1b2K36-0007hE-O8 for guix-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 16 May 2016 11:03:15 -0400 Received: from mail-lb0-x22c.google.com ([2a00:1450:4010:c04::22c]:33748) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1b2K36-0007h1-HL for guix-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 16 May 2016 11:03:12 -0400 Received: by mail-lb0-x22c.google.com with SMTP id jj5so51043694lbc.0 for ; Mon, 16 May 2016 08:03:12 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <20160514024937.GA15206@jasmine> (Leo Famulari's message of "Fri, 13 May 2016 22:49:37 -0400") List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-devel" To: Leo Famulari Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org Leo Famulari (2016-05-14 05:49 +0300) wrote: > On Fri, May 13, 2016 at 10:16:29PM +0300, Alex Kost wrote: >> Alex Griffin (2016-05-12 19:31 +0300) wrote: >> > Yes, it builds fine for me. It looks like the important line in your >> > build log is "c++: internal compiler error: Killed (program cc1plus)", >> > which could be from running out of memory. Does it still happen if you >> > add `#:parallel-build? #f` to the build system arguments? >>=20 >> Oh indeed, if parallel-build is disabled, it is built successfully. >> Thank you (and Leo)! >>=20 >> So I don't know, should =E2=80=98#:parallel-build? #f=E2=80=99 be used i= n the final >> package recipe? I guess not, as it looks like a problem on my side (not >> enough memory for parallel-build). > > My opinion is that 3 or 4 GB is not a very small amount of RAM for a > personal computer. > > I think that allowing users with "only" 4 GB RAM to build our ledger > package is worth it taking twice as long for the rest of us. > > Or, users with =E2=89=A4 4 GB RAM could make a private variant of ledger = that > disables parallel building. We sometimes suggest that users with > esoteric requirements or restrictions do something like this, but I > don't think this is one of those cases. I have commited this patch without =E2=80=98#:parallel-build? #f=E2=80=99. = Let's see if hydra can build it or not :-) --=20 Alex