From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?=) Subject: bug#24060: Test (tests/publish.scm) still fails after fix Date: Tue, 02 Aug 2016 18:10:45 +0200 Message-ID: <871t27tam2.fsf@gnu.org> References: <87r3ajs7p2.fsf@gmail.com> <87twf94ug1.fsf@gmail.com> <87y44lv4sf.fsf@gnu.org> <8737mrr1xm.fsf@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:44116) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bUcIZ-0002aV-LE for bug-guix@gnu.org; Tue, 02 Aug 2016 12:12:08 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bUcIU-0001Sr-JN for bug-guix@gnu.org; Tue, 02 Aug 2016 12:12:07 -0400 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:56515) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bUcIU-0001Sn-Fl for bug-guix@gnu.org; Tue, 02 Aug 2016 12:12:02 -0400 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1bUcIU-0005Lu-Bq for bug-guix@gnu.org; Tue, 02 Aug 2016 12:12:02 -0400 Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <8737mrr1xm.fsf@gmail.com> (Chris Marusich's message of "Sat, 30 Jul 2016 00:59:49 -0700") List-Id: Bug reports for GNU Guix List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-guix-bounces+gcggb-bug-guix=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "bug-Guix" To: Chris Marusich Cc: 24060@debbugs.gnu.org Chris Marusich skribis: > ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic Court=C3=A8s) writes: > >> Is this new failure systematic, or does it occur randomly? > > I've tried running the test over 100 times, and it failed every time. > I've also tested it in a QEMU guest running GuixSD, and it still fails. > I will see if I can reproduce it on a totally different physical > computer and get back to you. > >> What version of Guile do you use? > > The version is "guile (GNU Guile) 2.0.11". This version comes from > running "guix environment guix". > > I just now tried the same tests using guile-next (which is version > 2.1.2), and they still failed. > >> I wonder if this could be a remnant of . >> Does commenting out the =E2=80=9C/nar/gzip/*=E2=80=9D test hide the prob= lem? > > Commenting out that test-equals section did not hide the problem. It is reproducible on our current master (post-core-updates merge, using glibc 2.23). I=E2=80=99ve debugged a bit and found that commit 2c7b48c2fbccc0b2fc09ae055ce5b32f3fe6b441 fixes it for me. Could you try again with current master? For good measure, I also pushed a5c376034f0c465c00e88283dae6d59ac49612a9 to protect us from thread-safety issues that could in theory arise. Thanks, Ludo=E2=80=99.