From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic =?utf-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?=)
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] gnu: encfs: Update to 1.9.
Date: Tue, 13 Sep 2016 23:59:48 +0200
Message-ID: <871t0nqx4b.fsf@gnu.org>
References: <1473556426-19703-1-git-send-email-me@tobias.gr>
	<1473556426-19703-2-git-send-email-me@tobias.gr>
	<8760q1tess.fsf@gnu.org>
	<ccd17c97-c1b1-90a0-b0a5-4153b5357782@tobias.gr>
	<877fag579w.fsf@gnu.org>
	<e3313d78-466e-5c64-da0d-81284f3f1eb9@tobias.gr>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Return-path: <guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:53493)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <ludo@gnu.org>) id 1bjvkC-0001wH-Hj
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 13 Sep 2016 17:59:57 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <ludo@gnu.org>) id 1bjvk8-00014Y-Pn
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 13 Sep 2016 17:59:55 -0400
In-Reply-To: <e3313d78-466e-5c64-da0d-81284f3f1eb9@tobias.gr> (Tobias
	Geerinckx-Rice's message of "Tue, 13 Sep 2016 20:25:59 +0200")
List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution."
	<guix-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/guix-devel>,
	<mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-devel/>
List-Post: <mailto:guix-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guix-devel>,
	<mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: "Guix-devel" <guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
To: Tobias Geerinckx-Rice <me@tobias.gr>
Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org

Tobias Geerinckx-Rice <me@tobias.gr> skribis:

> Ludo',
>
> On 13/09/16 14:11, Ludovic Court=C3=A8s wrote:
>> However, =E2=80=98find-files=E2=80=99 does not include directories in it=
s result,=20
>> unless you explicitly ask for it.  So probably it should be:
>>=20
>> (for-each delete-file-recursively (find-files "internal" "^tinyxml2"=20
>> #:directories? #t))
>
> Indeed, thanks. I'll push with the more specific
>
>     (snippet '(for-each delete-file-recursively
>                         (find-files "internal" "^tinyxml2-[0-9]"
>                                     #:directories? #t)))))
>
> unless anyone raises any objections. Otherwise, find-files returns some
> matching subdirectories as well (=E2=80=98^tinyxml2-.*/.*/tinyxml2-.*=E2=
=80=99) which
> delete-file-recursively still tries to delete after the parent is gone.

Sounds good!

Thanks,
Ludo=E2=80=99.