From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: ng0 <ng0@we.make.ritual.n0.is>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] gnu: Add femtolisp.
Date: Wed, 14 Sep 2016 10:15:34 +0000
Message-ID: <871t0miy7t.fsf@we.make.ritual.n0.is>
References: <20160913190416.1462-1-ng0@we.make.ritual.n0.is>
	<87mvjbegxs.fsf@elephly.net> <87oa3rmtg8.fsf@we.make.ritual.n0.is>
	<87d1k6etze.fsf@elephly.net> <874m5i3k0h.fsf@we.make.ritual.n0.is>
	<87y42u24nc.fsf@we.make.ritual.n0.is> <87a8faer2a.fsf@elephly.net>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Return-path: <guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:35255)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <ng0@we.make.ritual.n0.is>) id 1bk7EF-0001Vt-3t
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 14 Sep 2016 06:15:43 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <ng0@we.make.ritual.n0.is>) id 1bk7EA-0005Rv-KR
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 14 Sep 2016 06:15:41 -0400
Received: from aibo.runbox.com ([91.220.196.211]:51445)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <ng0@we.make.ritual.n0.is>) id 1bk7EA-0005Rd-DM
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 14 Sep 2016 06:15:38 -0400
In-Reply-To: <87a8faer2a.fsf@elephly.net>
List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution."
	<guix-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/guix-devel>,
	<mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-devel/>
List-Post: <mailto:guix-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guix-devel>,
	<mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: "Guix-devel" <guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
To: Ricardo Wurmus <rekado@elephly.net>
Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org

Ricardo Wurmus <rekado@elephly.net> writes:

> ng0 <ng0@we.make.ritual.n0.is> writes:
>
>> ng0 <ng0@we.make.ritual.n0.is> writes:
>>
>>> [ Unknown signature status ]
>>> Ricardo Wurmus <rekado@elephly.net> writes:
>>>
>>>> Hi,
>>>>
>>>>> I hope the appended patch still applies.
>>>>
>>>> could you please send a new, complete patch?
>>>>
>>>> You seem to have removed the “#t” from the “install” phase
>>>> accidentally.  The return value should be kept.
>>>>
>>>> ~~ Ricardo
>>
>> Sorry, I'm not sure if I had sent the updated patch or not. The change
>> is so small.
>
> I’m sorry for the confusion.  Looking at the subject of these emails I
> assumed that this patch was supposed to *add* a *new* package, not
> modify an existing one.  I didn’t know that an earlier version had
> already been pushed.

No problem.

> In this case we should probably split these changes up as they are not
> related to one another.  Alternatively, the summary line should be
> changed to apply to all of the changes in this patch.

Can you give me an example how the summary line should look like then?

> ~~ Ricardo
>
>

-- 
              ng0