Re: [PATCH 0/1] Dbus update 1.10.12 for core-updates

[Kei Kebreau <kei@openmailbox.org>]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 935 bytes --]

Leo Famulari <leo@famulari.name> writes:

> There's a format string vulnerability (with unknown impact) in our dbus:
>
> http://seclists.org/oss-sec/2016/q4/85
>
> Please read that message and the linked bug report.
>
> My understanding of the upsream analysis of the format string
> vulnerability is that only the bus owner can trigger it. So, if the
> vulnerability allows arbitrary code execution, it would mean that root
> could execute arbitrary code via the system bus... not a huge problem.
> But still undesirable.
>
> What do you think? Should we update this on core-updates? Should we
> graft it on master?
>
> Leo Famulari (1):
>   gnu: dbus: Update to 1.10.12.
>
>  gnu/packages/glib.scm | 4 ++--
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

Excuse my ignorance, but when is a patch considered significant enough
to be updated on core-updates instead of master? Put another way, what
is the purpose of core-updates?

[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 818 bytes --]