From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: ng0 <ng0@libertad.pw>
Subject: Re:Re: Suggest add font: font-wqy-microhei
Date: Sat, 14 Jan 2017 14:37:29 +0000
Message-ID: <871sw5g11y.fsf@wasp.i-did-not-set--mail-host-address--so-tickle-me>
References: <452bcab7.22cd.1599584719b.Coremail.tumashu@163.com>
	<20170113105146.162bc10b@scratchpost.org>
	<49d708f1.9e82.159986723ef.Coremail.tumashu@163.com>
	<20170113222351.19739f31@scratchpost.org>
	<3c150dcc.d15.1599a909771.Coremail.tumashu@163.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Return-path: <guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:37986)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <ng0@libertad.pw>) id 1cSPRm-00063N-BV
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 14 Jan 2017 09:36:47 -0500
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <ng0@libertad.pw>) id 1cSPRj-0002hY-8R
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 14 Jan 2017 09:36:46 -0500
Received: from aibo.runbox.com ([91.220.196.211]:53245)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32)
	(Exim 4.71) (envelope-from <ng0@libertad.pw>) id 1cSPRj-0002h5-0O
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 14 Jan 2017 09:36:43 -0500
Received: from [10.9.9.210] (helo=mailfront10.runbox.com)
	by bars.runbox.com with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <ng0@libertad.pw>) id 1cSPRg-0003rl-BW
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 14 Jan 2017 15:36:40 +0100
Received: from [89.187.143.81] (helo=localhost)
	by mailfront10.runbox.com with esmtpsa (uid:892961 )
	(TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) id 1cSPRY-0005gv-Tn
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 14 Jan 2017 15:36:33 +0100
In-Reply-To: <3c150dcc.d15.1599a909771.Coremail.tumashu@163.com>
List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution."
	<guix-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/guix-devel>,
	<mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-devel/>
List-Post: <mailto:guix-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guix-devel>,
	<mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: "Guix-devel" <guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
To: guix-devel@gnu.org

Hi,

tumashu <tumashu@163.com> writes:

> If we need to use "fc-cache -f", suggest add it to document.

Maybe we finally have enough fonts to justify a
font-build-system, which would run "fc-cache -f" at the end of
it, or do something similar?
I have often seen this (and done this) when I used Gentoo.

> At 2017-01-14 05:23:55, "Danny Milosavljevic" <dannym@scratchpost.org> wrote:
>>Hi,
>>
>>On Fri, 13 Jan 2017 23:16:53 +0800 (CST)
>>tumashu  <tumashu@163.com> wrote:
>>
>>> When I install a font with a non-root account,  the font just can't be found by "fc-list",
>>> and run "fc-cache" is useless too, But run "fc-cache -f" can cache the installed font,
>>> it it a bug or just my machine problom?
>>
>>I don't know, sorry. It may be that fc-cache uses timestamps (mtime) to figure out whether a directory changed or not and that won't work for us since we always use the same mtime (for reproducibility). But that's just a guess - I hope someone else knows it...
>>

What do you think?
-- 
♥Ⓐ  ng0 -- https://www.inventati.org/patternsinthechaos/