From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Jan Nieuwenhuizen <janneke@gnu.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] gnu: Add unetbootin.
Date: Thu, 19 Jan 2017 21:58:09 +0100
Message-ID: <871svy22e6.fsf@gnu.org>
References: <871sw5ft93.fsf@gnu.org> <87wpdrxmu4.fsf@gnu.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Return-path: <guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:60844)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <janneke@gnu.org>) id 1cUJmx-0000q3-UT
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 19 Jan 2017 15:58:32 -0500
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <janneke@gnu.org>) id 1cUJmu-00038e-3T
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 19 Jan 2017 15:58:32 -0500
In-Reply-To: <87wpdrxmu4.fsf@gnu.org> ("Ludovic
	\=\?utf-8\?Q\?Court\=C3\=A8s\=22'\?\=
	\=\?utf-8\?Q\?s\?\= message of "Thu, 19 Jan 2017 13:20:51 +0100")
List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution."
	<guix-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/guix-devel>,
	<mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-devel/>
List-Post: <mailto:guix-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guix-devel>,
	<mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: "Guix-devel" <guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
To: Ludovic =?utf-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= <ludo@gnu.org>
Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org

Ludovic Court=C3=A8s writes:

> I=E2=80=99d suggest these minor cosmetic changes:

Thanks, these are all fine...

> In addition, there=E2=80=99s one thing we need to fix from an FSDG perspe=
ctive,
> which is described here:
> <https://libreplanet.org/wiki/Software_blacklist#unetbootin>.

Ouch, sorry.

> Could you check whether the package can be adjusted to use this FUSBi
> fork mentioned there, and send an updated patch?

I checked...FUSBi has been discontinued.  :-(

Possibly we can learn from other distros?  I checked if I could use
Debian (which I'm familiar with) but they do not have FUSBi and they
sadly also do not strip unetbootin; so this needs a little more
attention.

Greetings,
Jan

--=20
Jan Nieuwenhuizen <janneke@gnu.org> | GNU LilyPond http://lilypond.org
Freelance IT http://JoyofSource.com | Avatar=C2=AE  http://AvatarAcademy.nl=
=20=20