From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:52701)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1d6H6y-0002PD-5Y
	for guix-patches@gnu.org; Thu, 04 May 2017 09:48:05 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1d6H6x-00036p-Co
	for guix-patches@gnu.org; Thu, 04 May 2017 09:48:04 -0400
Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:55528)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16)
	(Exim 4.71) (envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>)
	id 1d6H6x-00036b-97
	for guix-patches@gnu.org; Thu, 04 May 2017 09:48:03 -0400
Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2)
	(envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1d6H6x-0008Gq-2Y
	for guix-patches@gnu.org; Thu, 04 May 2017 09:48:03 -0400
Subject: bug#26760: [PATCH] gnu: guile-bytestructures: Install sld files.
Resent-Message-ID: <handler.26760.D26760.149390568131785@debbugs.gnu.org>
From: ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?=)
References: <20170503151734.28872-1-m.othacehe@gmail.com>
	<8737clsopp.fsf@gnu.org> <861ss46dhp.fsf@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 04 May 2017 15:47:44 +0200
In-Reply-To: <861ss46dhp.fsf@gmail.com> (Mathieu Othacehe's message of "Thu,
	04 May 2017 13:57:38 +0200")
Message-ID: <871ss4ivi7.fsf@gnu.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
List-Id: <guix-patches.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/guix-patches>,
	<mailto:guix-patches-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:guix-patches@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:guix-patches-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guix-patches>,
	<mailto:guix-patches-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: guix-patches-bounces+kyle=kyleam.com@gnu.org
Sender: "Guix-patches" <guix-patches-bounces+kyle=kyleam.com@gnu.org>
To: Mathieu Othacehe <m.othacehe@gmail.com>
Cc: 26760-done@debbugs.gnu.org

Hi,

Mathieu Othacehe <m.othacehe@gmail.com> skribis:

> I pushed it in commit e8e1ace0394dd979a1ad5459ebb5b9247f7ff1d7.

Great.  I=E2=80=99m closing this issue.

> My work on (guix git) seems functional on guile 2.2. Now do you think I
> shall wait for Guix to switch to 2.2 before sending something to
> review, or backport guile-git and guile-bytestructures to guile 2.0 ?

No, no need to backport.  I think you can post what you have now if you
want.  Then we can either push it right way, with a proper configure.ac
check for the (git) module (which will always fail when using Guile
2.0), or put it in a branch until after the release.

Thanks,
Ludo=E2=80=99.