From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?=) Subject: bug#28659: v0.13: guix pull fails; libgit2-0.26.0 and 0.25.1 content hashes fail Date: Tue, 03 Oct 2017 14:30:26 +0200 Message-ID: <871smk9zx9.fsf@gnu.org> References: <877ewf18d4.fsf@gnu.org> <87o9ppoabw.fsf@gnu.org> <20171002182208.GB10773@jasmine.lan> <878tgt721q.fsf@gnu.org> <87a8198fli.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:47293) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dzMLp-0001jw-DL for bug-guix@gnu.org; Tue, 03 Oct 2017 08:31:06 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dzMLm-0005hV-5t for bug-guix@gnu.org; Tue, 03 Oct 2017 08:31:05 -0400 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:36685) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dzMLm-0005gv-27 for bug-guix@gnu.org; Tue, 03 Oct 2017 08:31:02 -0400 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1dzMLl-0007zP-SG for bug-guix@gnu.org; Tue, 03 Oct 2017 08:31:01 -0400 Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <87a8198fli.fsf@gnu.org> (Jan Nieuwenhuizen's message of "Mon, 02 Oct 2017 22:22:33 +0200") List-Id: Bug reports for GNU Guix List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-guix-bounces+gcggb-bug-guix=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "bug-Guix" To: Jan Nieuwenhuizen Cc: 28659@debbugs.gnu.org Jan Nieuwenhuizen skribis: > Ludovic Court=C3=A8s writes: [...] >> Perhaps we should make content-addressed mirrors configurable in a way >> that=E2=80=99s orthogonal to derivations, something similar in spirit to >> --substitute-urls? The difficulty is that content-addressed mirrors are >> not just URLs; see (guix download). > > Hmm. I'm not sure what problem we are solving. Should we only do this > for github(-like) tarballs? Do we see this problem with other sources, > should we prevent it? Possibly github will never do something like this > again. Or we could banish github/gitlab(?) auto-generated tarballs and > go for git checkouts+commits? Content-addressed mirrors help with disappearing and modified tarballs in general; it=E2=80=99s not just GitHub. Occasionally we see that problem with tarballs coming from elsewhere: 404 is quite frequent, and in-place modification happens from time to time (even on ftp.gnu.org=E2=80=A6). Ludo=E2=80=99.