From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Ricardo Wurmus Subject: bug#33993: Missing Texinfo documentation for Guix itself Date: Sun, 06 Jan 2019 10:10:31 +0100 Message-ID: <871s5qrw1k.fsf@elephly.net> References: <79d26d32-b9d4-7e8a-4457-bb4c0fd01c81@hyperbola.info> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: Received: from eggsout.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:57636 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gg4TX-0003Id-DG for bug-guix@gnu.org; Sun, 06 Jan 2019 04:12:08 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gg4TS-0001v6-GG for bug-guix@gnu.org; Sun, 06 Jan 2019 04:12:07 -0500 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:55548) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gg4TS-0001uu-DF for bug-guix@gnu.org; Sun, 06 Jan 2019 04:12:02 -0500 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1gg4TS-0003LT-4A for bug-guix@gnu.org; Sun, 06 Jan 2019 04:12:02 -0500 Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-Message-ID: In-reply-to: <79d26d32-b9d4-7e8a-4457-bb4c0fd01c81@hyperbola.info> List-Id: Bug reports for GNU Guix List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-guix-bounces+gcggb-bug-guix=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "bug-Guix" To: Adonay Felipe Nogueira Cc: 33993@debbugs.gnu.org Adonay Felipe Nogueira writes: > This copy of Guix (in Trisquel 8.0 Flidas amd64) was installed using the > shell script installer (for which I became root for that, that is, used > `sudo -i'). The binary version downloaded was 0.16.0. > > At least after pulling and upgrading the recipes based on commit > "5a7899fd88c1c463d3b75ac9077ccd183ddec914" (I didn't test this before > pulling, sorry), the Texinfo documentation for Guix itself seems to be > mising, even from root's profile. The installer script creates links from /var/guix/profiles/per-user/root/current-guix/share/info to /usr/local/share/info. Is the former directory populated as you would expect? > Interestingly, despite "$GUIX_PROFILE/share/info" not having the Texinfo > documentation as described, "/usr/local/share/info" has at least some > "dir."* files that seem to come from Guix. While "guix"{,"."*}".info.gz" > are present in the form of broken symbolic links, each of which pointing > to their counterparts in > "/var/guix/profiles/per-user/root/current-guix/share/info". This is odd. Do the files exist in /var/guix/profiles/per-user/root/current-guix/share/info? Can you please show us the output of =E2=80=9Cls -la /usr/local/share/info=E2=80=9D= and =E2=80=9Cls -la /var/guix/profiles/per-user/root/current-guix/share/info=E2=80=9D? -- Ricardo