From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= Subject: bug#34717: GPL and Openssl incompatibilities in u-boot and possibly others Date: Fri, 08 Mar 2019 11:23:05 +0100 Message-ID: <871s3his1i.fsf@gnu.org> References: <87tvgkiurn.fsf@ponder> <87zhq8f2zz.fsf@gnu.org> <87ftrzuxmh.fsf@ponder> <87o96m8f09.fsf@ponder> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:53774) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1h2Cfa-0003NY-PQ for bug-guix@gnu.org; Fri, 08 Mar 2019 05:24:03 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1h2CfZ-0002X8-Vo for bug-guix@gnu.org; Fri, 08 Mar 2019 05:24:02 -0500 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:50549) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1h2CfZ-0002Wv-Qr for bug-guix@gnu.org; Fri, 08 Mar 2019 05:24:01 -0500 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1h2CfZ-0006dP-K4 for bug-guix@gnu.org; Fri, 08 Mar 2019 05:24:01 -0500 Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <87o96m8f09.fsf@ponder> (Vagrant Cascadian's message of "Thu, 07 Mar 2019 15:02:30 -0800") List-Id: Bug reports for GNU Guix List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-guix-bounces+gcggb-bug-guix=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "bug-Guix" To: Vagrant Cascadian Cc: 34717@debbugs.gnu.org Hi, Vagrant Cascadian skribis: > I've tested that the attached patch builds all u-boot-* targets on > x86_64 (cross-building most of them), with openssl removed from > native-inputs. > > Unfortunately, u-boot-tools fails it's tests on aarch64 and armhf, but > that appears to be the case with or without this patch, so it's no worse > off than it was... This can be fixed separately then. > I'm not sure where it would be appropriate to add more comments > regarding the GPL/Openssl incompatibilities; e.g. if someone were to > propose adding one of the u-boot targets that requires it, they might > just go ahead and re-add the openssl input... There=E2=80=99s always a risk. I guess we=E2=80=99ll have to be careful wh= en doing reviews. In addition, we can add a =E2=80=98lint=E2=80=99 checker for this case, WDY= T? > From ee613387c49ca60905e0a40af8af017828c8aec8 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 > From: Vagrant Cascadian > Date: Thu, 7 Mar 2019 21:50:58 +0000 > Subject: [PATCH] gnu: u-boot: Remove openssl input. > > Fixes: https://bugs.gnu.org/34717 > > * gnu/packages/bootloaders (u-boot): Remove openssl from native-inputs. > (u-boot-tools): Disable FIT_SIGNATURES in tests. Applied, thanks! Ludo=E2=80=99.