From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:40036) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1i3JSB-0005g6-5u for guix-patches@gnu.org; Thu, 29 Aug 2019 08:23:08 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1i3JS9-0002z8-V9 for guix-patches@gnu.org; Thu, 29 Aug 2019 08:23:03 -0400 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:42892) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1i3JS9-0002yu-Qu for guix-patches@gnu.org; Thu, 29 Aug 2019 08:23:01 -0400 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1i3JS9-00048C-KB for guix-patches@gnu.org; Thu, 29 Aug 2019 08:23:01 -0400 Subject: [bug#37121] [PATCH 00/40] Update Xfce to 4.14 Resent-Message-ID: From: Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= References: <87blwj35an.fsf@lprndn.info> <87ftllgskz.fsf@gnu.org> <877e6x10nw.fsf@lprndn.info> Date: Thu, 29 Aug 2019 14:21:54 +0200 In-Reply-To: <877e6x10nw.fsf@lprndn.info> (L. p. R. n. d. n.'s message of "Wed, 28 Aug 2019 22:43:15 +0200") Message-ID: <871rx4jh5p.fsf@gnu.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-patches-bounces+kyle=kyleam.com@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-patches" To: L p R n d n Cc: 37121@debbugs.gnu.org Hello, L p R n d n skribis: > Ludovic Court=C3=A8s writes: > >> Hello, >> >> L p R n d n skribis: >> >>> Here is my take on updating xfce to 4.14. >> >> Woow, thanks for all the work! >> >>> The update switches Xfce to gtk-3 but gtk-2 compatibility is kept. >>> Also there a few changes to add or clarify some features like vala API >>> or gobject introspection. >>> Testing is welcome. >> >> So, I hope you won=E2=80=99t hate me for asking, but=E2=80=A6 can we sep= arate the bits >> that are really part of the Xfce upgrade or required by the upgrade, >> from those that are not directly related? The libxklavier, mousepad, >> and =E2=80=9Cfix tests=E2=80=9D changes come to mind. That would make t= he review work >> less intimidating. :-) >> >> Also, I suspect all the xfce* and libxf* packages need to be upgraded in >> lockstep; that is, they all need to be either 4.14 or 4.12, but not a >> mixture thereof. Thus, I=E2=80=99d actually prefer a single commit upgr= ading >> all of these. WDYT? >> >> There are probably exceptions such as Thunar that do not strictly need >> to be upgraded at the same time; these can remain in a separate commit. > > No problem. It's more git training! :-) > I'll make a single commit for all xfce4-core packages and leave the rest > sepearate. Is it ok? Yes, all those that need to be updated together (which I think are the libxf* and xfce* packages, but again I=E2=80=99m no Xfce expert) should go = in one patch. > Also, do you need me to send them at this bug report or a new one? Please send the Xfce upgrade here, and the patches that are not Xfce-specific elsewhere. Thank you! Ludo=E2=80=99.