From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Pierre Neidhardt Subject: Re: i686-linux GCC package on x86_64 Date: Thu, 10 Oct 2019 15:35:22 +0200 Message-ID: <871rvkafl1.fsf@ambrevar.xyz> References: <87d0fs2q0p.fsf@ambrevar.xyz> <87d0featrl.fsf@ambrevar.xyz> <87v9t0furk.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature" Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:42990) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1iIYbG-00068E-Hy for guix-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 10 Oct 2019 09:35:27 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1iIYbF-0003ET-Cb for guix-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 10 Oct 2019 09:35:26 -0400 In-Reply-To: <87v9t0furk.fsf@gnu.org> List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-devel" To: Ludovic =?utf-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi Ludo, Yes, this is what I had tried. Sadly it works for all packages that I know= of except GCC. Maybe a bug? =2D-=20 Pierre Neidhardt https://ambrevar.xyz/ --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQEzBAEBCAAdFiEEUPM+LlsMPZAEJKvom9z0l6S7zH8FAl2fM5oACgkQm9z0l6S7 zH8gIQf+L3eqAFRstnONwcfEyVoGaNWskOYG5JTwbvh8qz/gz8oMXCFdffCqS2nE Wgf15JZNFqh4KaK5lBXFTVkJECZsT6KHnCQ0xeshENyVw+ZqY2vUIMKX8+OX5ODZ fWNwvrjZ5UlZ/BNbxwydEyA1h0jCdOD9S/q1mX2QE/0wRVR+7A4zVjWanvNjZk/Q fb026ftrnnw7YWNEiSyuHVczofntg9s+9CT2GRD2wGYQsTnwdEc0gEHijB9MGPMX EHpXWW2MSaQuXy1v13cDmyK2wGLIbygPyVCMQWk08687o+zN9XDwvs8db771ohvJ qW9yXCaL4EttU8QGATOfJIm3yNPJJg== =xWvs -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=--