From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:41527)
 by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1)
 (envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1ii4Jz-0002xS-Qm
 for guix-patches@gnu.org; Thu, 19 Dec 2019 17:31:05 -0500
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
 (envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1ii4Jy-0006Dz-Ls
 for guix-patches@gnu.org; Thu, 19 Dec 2019 17:31:03 -0500
Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:39711)
 by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16)
 (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>)
 id 1ii4Jy-0006CQ-El
 for guix-patches@gnu.org; Thu, 19 Dec 2019 17:31:02 -0500
Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2)
 (envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1ii4Jy-000633-9a
 for guix-patches@gnu.org; Thu, 19 Dec 2019 17:31:02 -0500
Subject: [bug#38593] Remove invalid library directories from some haskell
 packages
Resent-Message-ID: <handler.38593.B38593.157679464623210@debbugs.gnu.org>
From: Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= <ludo@gnu.org>
References: <CAKf5CqXw-e+Rc2ytbcEZhai2kv18YQutK1pr7un5P6UgpZ74kQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 19 Dec 2019 23:30:20 +0100
In-Reply-To: <CAKf5CqXw-e+Rc2ytbcEZhai2kv18YQutK1pr7un5P6UgpZ74kQ@mail.gmail.com>
 (John Soo's message of "Fri, 13 Dec 2019 14:38:01 +0000")
Message-ID: <871rt0kkxv.fsf@gnu.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
List-Id: <guix-patches.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/guix-patches>,
 <mailto:guix-patches-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-patches>
List-Post: <mailto:guix-patches@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:guix-patches-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guix-patches>,
 <mailto:guix-patches-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: guix-patches-bounces+kyle=kyleam.com@gnu.org
Sender: "Guix-patches" <guix-patches-bounces+kyle=kyleam.com@gnu.org>
To: John Soo <jsoo1@asu.edu>
Cc: 38593@debbugs.gnu.org

Hi,

John Soo <jsoo1@asu.edu> skribis:

> When compiling with ghc, I have been getting the message that the followi=
ng
> packages have invalid package databases.

Does it hurt in practice, or are these invalid databases shadowed by the
one created in the profile?

> diff --git a/gnu/packages/haskell-xyz.scm b/gnu/packages/haskell-xyz.scm
> index fb6833207d..1d78eb7894 100644
> --- a/gnu/packages/haskell-xyz.scm
> +++ b/gnu/packages/haskell-xyz.scm
> @@ -5500,6 +5500,13 @@ representations of current time.")
>         ("ghc-quickcheck" ,ghc-quickcheck)
>         ("ghc-temporary" ,ghc-temporary)
>         ("hspec-discover" ,hspec-discover)))
> +    (arguments
> +     `(#:phases
> +       (modify-phases %standard-phases
> +         (add-after 'install 'remove-lib
> +           (lambda* (#:key outputs #:allow-other-keys)
> +             (delete-file-recursively
> +              (string-append (assoc-ref outputs "out") "/lib")))))))

Should we add a phase in =E2=80=98haskell-build-system=E2=80=99 that system=
atically
removes package databases?

Thanks,
Ludo=E2=80=99.