From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:52133) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jEuIJ-0006Fg-Mv for guix-patches@gnu.org; Thu, 19 Mar 2020 08:29:04 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1jEuII-00062D-Ov for guix-patches@gnu.org; Thu, 19 Mar 2020 08:29:03 -0400 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:35914) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1jEuII-000629-Id for guix-patches@gnu.org; Thu, 19 Mar 2020 08:29:02 -0400 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1jEuII-0004g2-FG for guix-patches@gnu.org; Thu, 19 Mar 2020 08:29:02 -0400 Subject: [bug#38546] [PATCH v5] Julia: Update to 1.3.1 Resent-Message-ID: From: Marius Bakke In-Reply-To: <878sjz6r0u.fsf@guixSD.i-did-not-set--mail-host-address--so-tickle-me> References: <87imjvwvjx.fsf@guixSD.i-did-not-set--mail-host-address--so-tickle-me> <87fteywndk.fsf@guixSD.i-did-not-set--mail-host-address--so-tickle-me> <87blplwmuk.fsf@guixSD.i-did-not-set--mail-host-address--so-tickle-me> <20200316100641.GK927@E5400> <87fte7772m.fsf@guixSD.i-did-not-set--mail-host-address--so-tickle-me> <20200317081210.GN927@E5400> <87zhcfb29s.fsf@devup.no> <878sjz6r0u.fsf@guixSD.i-did-not-set--mail-host-address--so-tickle-me> Date: Thu, 19 Mar 2020 13:28:09 +0100 Message-ID: <871rpobkbq.fsf@devup.no> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature" List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-patches-bounces+kyle=kyleam.com@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-patches" To: =?UTF-8?Q?Nicol=C3=B2?= Balzarotti , Efraim Flashner Cc: 38546@debbugs.gnu.org, zimoun --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Nicol=C3=B2 Balzarotti writes: > Hi, > > I looked at it. THe patch is literally a one-line change[1] they make > to support RFC 3986. According to [2], the patch has been ported to > fedora http-parser. Our version is different form the one bundled in > libgit2, but deleting the corresponding line (see snippet) libgit2 tests > are now passing. However, this http-parser test is failing: > > *** http_parser_parse_url("http://hostname:/") "proxy empty port" test fa= iled, unexpected rv 0 *** > > I opened an issue upstream here [3] so that if they fix it we can > continue unbundling it without having to patch it ourselves. > > Hope they decide to upstream it > > I'll send updates if there are news on the issue, Awesome, thank you very much for looking into it. I have no objections to taking the patches from the upstream PR [0] if that helps updating Julia. :-) 0: https://github.com/nodejs/http-parser/pull/483 --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQEzBAEBCgAdFiEEu7At3yzq9qgNHeZDoqBt8qM6VPoFAl5zZVkACgkQoqBt8qM6 VPou8Af9HL+BSWK6l4TPDPEN99LuxehYt3+wNWiiVuKy7dl8uYsVA3uqg6iYF2Zh 3PUE01CHFFxCiDUWWd3GpcFMXT00x46OUXTbwAhT+fztOEfcQK+6E7yBSa154MjE kLT8V9TCHuCsgQh/8EyO0nDdqiopqOBUSmw7y6Y1dzX9WjzZpMP3clasSeVnYhwg L0J2F/CbWxqbXl9MHKnxNPp+LckIodZez+WeGSdPHP0VZ2Go5lbc1j63vb01+SUj W3SwNCD9XQXfRhTpdifUv5XLPlkCu5D4cUVfDsRaftC7iFzvr9ApwzFjM4ydX27v f6RK3mgOQ9fTq5bgjiJorbSeQg9YHQ== =dSmi -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=--