From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:60032) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jLHh9-0003aP-1V for guix-patches@gnu.org; Sun, 05 Apr 2020 22:41:03 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1jLHh8-0006xg-2a for guix-patches@gnu.org; Sun, 05 Apr 2020 22:41:02 -0400 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:35459) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1jLHh7-0006xc-Ti for guix-patches@gnu.org; Sun, 05 Apr 2020 22:41:02 -0400 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1jLHh7-0008WG-Rb for guix-patches@gnu.org; Sun, 05 Apr 2020 22:41:01 -0400 Subject: [bug#40264] Linphone: 11-add-mediastreamer-v3 Resent-Message-ID: From: maxim.cournoyer@gmail.com In-Reply-To: <3c47cbc6b4f15bc10b3c6e4c9e1b992a@disroot.org> (Raghav Gururajan's message of "Mon, 06 Apr 2020 00:28:01 +0000") References: <20200406021448.3835ff95@scratchpost.org> <20200405214134.3558655a@scratchpost.org> <8d37c9308eddb3c687689ed614c86386@disroot.org> <20200405202940.0408231a@scratchpost.org> <3c47cbc6b4f15bc10b3c6e4c9e1b992a@disroot.org> Date: Sun, 05 Apr 2020 22:40:26 -0400 Message-ID: <871rp12v6t.fsf@hurd.i-did-not-set--mail-host-address--so-tickle-me> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-patches-bounces+kyle=kyleam.com@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-patches" To: Raghav Gururajan Cc: Danny Milosavljevic , 40264@debbugs.gnu.org Hello, "Raghav Gururajan" writes: > Hi Danny! > >>> Oh no, that patch is required. MS won't build with srtp enabled, without it. >> >> Okay--added in commit 2c56aeaea94d3914acf79f9bbabeef1b3ec8aa07. > > Thanks so much :-) > >>> Shall we please keep the name "mediastreamer" for package and "mediastreamer2" for variable? The >>> release tarballs have not been renamed. We'll change the package name when it is changed in >>> releases by upstream. This will consistent with other packages in linphone.scm. >> >> I'll see what the others say--but I'm not opposed to use the other name. mediastreamer2 is better. Otherwise we get a confused mix of mediastreamer-2.16.1 / mediastreamer2-2.16.1 under share/, for example. The name really is mediastreamer2 in the code/doc, everywhere except in for the tarball file name. I'll push some refinements I made today in a moment, mostly adding the tester binary and data to a 'tester' output (it comes with about 20 MiB of data files). Great work! Maxim