From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mp12.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:8:6d80::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by ms0.migadu.com with LMTPS id GIjmNxSUCmJlBQEAgWs5BA (envelope-from ) for ; Mon, 14 Feb 2022 18:40:36 +0100 Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:8:6d80::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by mp12.migadu.com with LMTPS id 4AhvNBSUCmJnHgEAauVa8A (envelope-from ) for ; Mon, 14 Feb 2022 18:40:36 +0100 Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8614B38A63 for ; Mon, 14 Feb 2022 18:40:36 +0100 (CET) Received: from localhost ([::1]:43260 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1nJfL1-0007tS-OX for larch@yhetil.org; Mon, 14 Feb 2022 12:40:35 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:55982) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1nJfKO-0007pD-T8 for guix-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 14 Feb 2022 12:39:58 -0500 Received: from hera.aquilenet.fr ([185.233.100.1]:48280) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1nJfKN-0002Kj-1N; Mon, 14 Feb 2022 12:39:56 -0500 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by hera.aquilenet.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 296DEB6F; Mon, 14 Feb 2022 18:39:53 +0100 (CET) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at aquilenet.fr Received: from hera.aquilenet.fr ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (hera.aquilenet.fr [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id NW4P7H_tpW-1; Mon, 14 Feb 2022 18:39:52 +0100 (CET) Received: from ribbon (91-160-117-201.subs.proxad.net [91.160.117.201]) by hera.aquilenet.fr (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4AF5BB50; Mon, 14 Feb 2022 18:39:52 +0100 (CET) From: =?utf-8?Q?Ludovic_Court=C3=A8s?= To: Ricardo Wurmus Subject: Re: Dropping gzip-compressed substitutes? References: <87r18gfc00.fsf@inria.fr> <87y22o166g.fsf@elephly.net> X-URL: http://www.fdn.fr/~lcourtes/ X-Revolutionary-Date: 26 =?utf-8?Q?Pluvi=C3=B4se?= an 230 de la =?utf-8?Q?R=C3=A9volution?= X-PGP-Key-ID: 0x090B11993D9AEBB5 X-PGP-Key: http://www.fdn.fr/~lcourtes/ludovic.asc X-PGP-Fingerprint: 3CE4 6455 8A84 FDC6 9DB4 0CFB 090B 1199 3D9A EBB5 X-OS: x86_64-pc-linux-gnu Date: Mon, 14 Feb 2022 18:39:51 +0100 In-Reply-To: <87y22o166g.fsf@elephly.net> (Ricardo Wurmus's message of "Sun, 06 Feb 2022 14:18:35 +0100") Message-ID: <871r05tkig.fsf@gnu.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.2 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spamd-Bar: + X-Rspamd-Server: hera X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 296DEB6F X-Spamd-Result: default: False [1.61 / 15.00]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; RCPT_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[3]; TO_DN_SOME(0.00)[]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; R_MIXED_CHARSET(0.71)[subject]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; SUBJECT_ENDS_QUESTION(1.00)[]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[] Received-SPF: softfail client-ip=185.233.100.1; envelope-from=ludo@gnu.org; helo=hera.aquilenet.fr X-Spam_score_int: -11 X-Spam_score: -1.2 X-Spam_bar: - X-Spam_report: (-1.2 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_SOFTFAIL=0.665, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: guix-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org, GNU Guix maintainers Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-devel" X-Migadu-Flow: FLOW_IN X-Migadu-Country: US ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yhetil.org; s=key1; t=1644860436; h=from:from:sender:sender:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date: message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version: content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references:list-id:list-help: list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-post; bh=l49fXlXVNekFDWLkF0iv/F3QHht9/TePbgRmDTZ3iqg=; b=nW6MDXdS2d7T5Vdrh6uGO/+sPOjb/7Le4FSsbE9BENKYcBGzaUBi4GY3aB/CVlgAFZywcg +5v4nCf5Vvk7SCec38X9yYfgARrDdpaR5x4ctux1hNadLiPj8UWJyC+jlN7g3+/d5rjmav 00eY9tUhDxb6zM0GfmIjXuBom+6YeYwM41B4hUrFX4hy9aKufGYkmwpKxDavzcejBMD7Gw mS4d3QSuYXPy1HRzwLm9YiJLK7zZlL1f4nC4vUzh1q98kXT7IhXvhstWmpQbnx+TPYKqTz U8z5ozEv19V7SLfnS5N/PO9W7X05AtyQ62xE0L3YIvrl3PCfBkMN6praLwlBYg== ARC-Seal: i=1; s=key1; d=yhetil.org; t=1644860436; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; b=DDW535zqRNv1FrnyAI6O+ADtVtmOFNlToKS805bUvTMhRXxfdg04bskT7bWkzQWXgZYbjt KFGBZjY8a+go9bT4WnhiWC6ecUV7UcNu8ghN5jwsKX+ltAXuG0yZB5nVniU+7IkLJx8+XK mHudRYupEqSFVmHELKN/A1hxjmJ+e4lxesb9dWdCYfznhdOTpBoosUpkKaThxybTo/R3nx 9GSj3vo2jQKh+z71Tn5iFg488GJ6iiDaEtZiLt46AAalOWGKu4KUDYExkV9PRZRBZD/aE3 XzEDUIjGqxWpCCxjtsdJoysm7R7KWajNuWQZaL3kzsHebwD0MJeTpngZXgEwLg== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=none; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=gnu.org; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of "guix-devel-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="guix-devel-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" X-Migadu-Spam-Score: -2.63 Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=none; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=gnu.org; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of "guix-devel-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="guix-devel-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" X-Migadu-Queue-Id: 8614B38A63 X-Spam-Score: -2.63 X-Migadu-Scanner: scn1.migadu.com X-TUID: mw+GaVbl/1U5 Hi! Ricardo Wurmus skribis: > Ludovic Court=C3=A8s writes: [...] >> It was too early back then but I think we could consider dropping it >> after 1.4.0 is out, announcing it in advance. > > Sounds good to me. The maintainers went ahead and announced it, thumbs up! It might also be worth emailing info-guix? >> To those users still running a pre-1.1.0 daemon lacking lzip support=C2= =B9, >> things will just break, or at least they won=E2=80=99t get newer substit= utes. >> It=E2=80=99s been almost 2 years since 1.1.0 was released though. > > I=E2=80=99ll admit that back then I had neglected to upgrade the shared d= aemon > at the MDC, missing the change to different compression types. A > considerable chunk of the demand for gzip substitutes then could have > been due to the MDC. I think it=E2=80=99s understandable; it=E2=80=99s an invisible component, a= fter all. A few weeks ago I discovered that a colleague of mine was running guix-daemon from 0.15.0=E2=80=A6 > Printing a warning is a good way to get people=E2=80=99s attention, so I= =E2=80=99m all > for it to prepare for the big break. Mathieu did that in f9c62b23cc88541756656b3ec602ce987828d906, which should help! Ludo=E2=80=99.