From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mp1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:403:58f0::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by ms13.migadu.com with LMTPS id IHSHICNYgGeWEwAA62LTzQ:P1 (envelope-from ) for ; Thu, 09 Jan 2025 23:13:39 +0000 Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:403:58f0::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by mp1.migadu.com with LMTPS id IHSHICNYgGeWEwAA62LTzQ (envelope-from ) for ; Fri, 10 Jan 2025 00:13:39 +0100 X-Envelope-To: larch@yhetil.org Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=pass header.d=debbugs.gnu.org header.s=debbugs-gnu-org header.b=LaWmwkwa; dkim=fail ("headers rsa verify failed") header.d=gnu.org header.s=fencepost-gnu-org header.b=PZ15+4KS; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of "guix-patches-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="guix-patches-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org"; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=gnu.org ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yhetil.org; s=key1; t=1736464419; h=from:from:sender:sender:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date: message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version: content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding:resent-cc: resent-from:resent-sender:resent-message-id:in-reply-to:in-reply-to: references:references:list-id:list-help:list-unsubscribe: list-subscribe:list-post:dkim-signature; bh=CT3OkXkZJEAl9eo24t6GBy57lQISiDfEprIF4SJ5Iz8=; b=JhP/AippUYIPfV3j3QAjzeWKyvNRDXLLktloGuC+7hZAJEWC4MWm5LSj88IEFraa6m3xy4 nUW+ljchzqhuqZ19QpKGg5s9IE8hKcT0T9PCw4chhE4X6VRx79EYCFCQA+A2zMobpd5U2Q rNUCmkK4KcgTVwducEG5kCtS0aUfczjveJI6ihgR9uXEhHdFEXyt9dwLN6JLFQEWlb/6D0 8Gc01uthNajJfHfI4hbS/xzQblXWljUMWFGdyTrMWU09eAg7/rwo7gv9iDgzH8Z407XZ1p 6Vb/46JkODAYcy92Fc1WLiLE8YzwFRn0MeNa7HWbuA+aWk9QQ0nQxn00BiBcDg== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=pass header.d=debbugs.gnu.org header.s=debbugs-gnu-org header.b=LaWmwkwa; dkim=fail ("headers rsa verify failed") header.d=gnu.org header.s=fencepost-gnu-org header.b=PZ15+4KS; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of "guix-patches-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="guix-patches-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org"; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=gnu.org ARC-Seal: i=1; s=key1; d=yhetil.org; t=1736464419; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; b=tMMJ/3K7pjCCuPZR1S7xjNpTuqQbNg3vbwVzh3cGJ9vHgnWgbETTmoBJM6QsPuUIhlhcIT KR8k8GXvwNoNAMn9IOxxl2ddx7D57GzkUsIO8Ln8nkoeAd82WSamGWeuRwwU2qIr5J7dTF wy0LCaMjOEkzFLxeI/fWtGgXH0E/uuCtAqjgLJKjO4WRzUvJ7kz3EUpfbFQH/fudnr6aZV VDJ8VP9F/PWo0j7ZteXsIJQCYxKAyWqZHvonW7T7YltZ3bU+rJ94D0UnzPj8AS1Chjzjw/ 5Ed6avFFhNZ2Dn/vb6C1/kT0vAf9wxK00mZypAJ6P5pfKcJ2kJrFpA6mEw8WVQ== Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6BBA58A8E5 for ; Fri, 10 Jan 2025 00:13:39 +0100 (CET) Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1tW16L-0003pp-Ai; Thu, 09 Jan 2025 17:34:05 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1tW16J-0003nV-2N for guix-patches@gnu.org; Thu, 09 Jan 2025 17:34:03 -0500 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:5::43]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1tW16I-0005Q6-Nd for guix-patches@gnu.org; Thu, 09 Jan 2025 17:34:02 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=debbugs.gnu.org; s=debbugs-gnu-org; h=MIME-Version:Date:References:In-Reply-To:From:To:Subject; bh=CT3OkXkZJEAl9eo24t6GBy57lQISiDfEprIF4SJ5Iz8=; b=LaWmwkwaU2AJgRcEkgdvU8VS9L40KkmJIaRWgal8p9C308IcUS7Vi3SboIjcuJjO+b1BFA7XKzxxBs3pSJiuj0YkwXTvexij0rVSuOwuwgdcKJMVVUkcay/AZbjPka6kavtIfWlmPTjrj1EwAKMzgtPrH1Lrs1H4UqGp7wrpBTzi2D4YqFyVXu/9Erg2w2UNV6uIdXDZ6Pe25rZS7bJxtK/Z7dIEzRphTC4+L33iXqn6e0gZNyVAypD3KfVnNy4NJJsA4rAQY1AAKWzqbWb7Ik3vV2SkofQWvBBNCzB4W7GuSbSe1lWwajjzoFFlCD6ybbZLFWWJWENg4A5sqmPttw==; Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1tW16I-000204-Fg for guix-patches@gnu.org; Thu, 09 Jan 2025 17:34:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: [bug#74736] [PATCH v2 0/1] Add Request-For-Comment process. Resent-From: Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: guix-patches@gnu.org Resent-Date: Thu, 09 Jan 2025 22:34:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 74736 X-GNU-PR-Package: guix-patches X-GNU-PR-Keywords: patch To: Simon Tournier Cc: =?UTF-8?Q?No=C3=A9?= Lopez , =?UTF-8?Q?No=C3=A9?= Lopez , Christopher Baines , 74736@debbugs.gnu.org Received: via spool by 74736-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B74736.17364619927588 (code B ref 74736); Thu, 09 Jan 2025 22:34:02 +0000 Received: (at 74736) by debbugs.gnu.org; 9 Jan 2025 22:33:12 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:55192 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1tW15T-0001yJ-K9 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 09 Jan 2025 17:33:11 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:32902) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1tW15R-0001xz-GK for 74736@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 09 Jan 2025 17:33:09 -0500 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1tW15K-0005NB-Dd; Thu, 09 Jan 2025 17:33:03 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnu.org; s=fencepost-gnu-org; h=MIME-Version:Date:References:In-Reply-To:Subject:To: From; bh=CT3OkXkZJEAl9eo24t6GBy57lQISiDfEprIF4SJ5Iz8=; b=PZ15+4KSrYRgu4B2zxbg YrNKKbu2VYE4QhDSNeZz4TG21p4c6to4Fsa68Yol86V55yn0FHxd4z2ypdPxz9d1TwU1CFOwgE2gG MfBm8qIWX4MEkd/pr7t90W1wPEezpF8+zGPIt8ugdpEMwYoBV+JSCJ3J8AesPUvDL8jR3yVJbz+pA PY8pxN6qaf7ptzw5nz2KUkRcffpXSX7W8dotegwmCiMVOfFXYBJh5CTBWn6Qr1ASRioMMkqtLYaGG 7Rll0p+5wCIH562qYd99/TmhkjIqTmBx9ApGTQ8ezx2k5GAFTuS0CQ3CMvIM0WOwNG4S94q4DJ6/O Gxfc33ipwtDaGw==; From: Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= In-Reply-To: <87seps3qm8.fsf@gmail.com> (Simon Tournier's message of "Thu, 09 Jan 2025 17:21:19 +0100") References: <87y0zn4lvi.fsf_-_@gnu.org> <87seps3qm8.fsf@gmail.com> Date: Thu, 09 Jan 2025 23:32:59 +0100 Message-ID: <871pxbobxg.fsf_-_@gnu.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: guix-patches@gnu.org List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-patches-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org Sender: guix-patches-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org X-Migadu-Flow: FLOW_IN X-Migadu-Country: US X-Migadu-Scanner: mx11.migadu.com X-Migadu-Spam-Score: -2.17 X-Spam-Score: -2.17 X-Migadu-Queue-Id: 6BBA58A8E5 X-TUID: XNscmCxowF+L Hello, (Stripping comments/suggestions I agree with.) Simon Tournier skribis: >> supporters: ? >> submitted: 2024-12-12 > > I think the choice of this date is unclear. Do you consider that your > reply or mine implies being Supporter? > > Well, since this document bootstrap the process it=E2=80=99s difficult. := -) > Especially when the first draft had been sent on 2023-10-31. Yeah, it=E2=80=99s quite arbitrary here, I=E2=80=99m fine with any date. Obviously it=E2=80=99ll be more important once the process is actually in p= lace. >> ## Supporters >> >> A supporter is a contributor sufficiently familiar with the project=E2= =80=99s >> practices, hence it is recommended, but not mandatory, to be a team >> member. Supporters do not have to agree with all the points of the RFC >> but should generally be satisfied that the proposed additions are a good >> thing for the community. >> >> Supporters help the author(s) by participating in discussions, amending >> the document as it is being discussed, and acting as timekeepers. > > I would add (picked from v5): > > Please make sure that all have the time and space for expressing > their comments. The RFC is about significant changes, thus more > opinions is better than less. You mean that this (soliciting opinions) is something supporters/sponsors should do, right? I agree. >> ```dot <- TODO: make this a separate file > > I would prefer to let the dot file here as-is. Because it=E2=80=99s easi= er to > read in full terminal mode. In addition, yes maybe we could display the > graph as an image file. Yeah, I=E2=80=99m split between Dot and ASCII art=E2=80=A6 > As said above, I would clarify: > > The RFC is *submitted* once one or more > people publicly reply =E2=80=9CI support=E2=80=9D and volunteers = to be > supporters; the next step is the *discussion period*. OK. >> All members of any team of the Guix project can participate in >> deliberation and are encouraged to do so. > > I would restore the past suggestion to mention the file =E2=80=99teams.sc= m=E2=80=99; see > suggestion below (mark **). Agreed. I=E2=80=99ll send v7 tomorrow. Thank you! Ludo=E2=80=99.