From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mp1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:303:e16b::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by ms13.migadu.com with LMTPS id qEauA4qQfWfsegAA62LTzQ:P1 (envelope-from ) for ; Tue, 07 Jan 2025 20:37:30 +0000 Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:303:e16b::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by mp1.migadu.com with LMTPS id qEauA4qQfWfsegAA62LTzQ (envelope-from ) for ; Tue, 07 Jan 2025 21:37:30 +0100 X-Envelope-To: larch@yhetil.org Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=pass header.d=debbugs.gnu.org header.s=debbugs-gnu-org header.b=Y2z1KS5U; dkim=fail ("headers rsa verify failed") header.d=posteo.net header.s=2017 header.b=BOpFdeGX; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of "guix-patches-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="guix-patches-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org"; dmarc=fail reason="SPF not aligned (strict), DKIM not aligned (strict)" header.from=posteo.net (policy=none) ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yhetil.org; s=key1; t=1736282250; h=from:from:sender:sender:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date: message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:mime-version:mime-version: content-type:content-type:resent-cc:resent-from:resent-sender: resent-message-id:in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references: list-id:list-help:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-post: dkim-signature; bh=4OWGvviE3+lMc3RYiWIujhrOlyLEbucwlFKMjcaaqqA=; b=Ef2MMwBtS7ogXUHOLuiPQP/CcS/j/zqcDLZuWILG1IGRCXqcMONYd5Irh7yAxsooWtMpMJ rJSSXD9Xctkfpf0hBI+FNqSE362yDQUDipMJKbfo3wyLGYTzbNcrWyPbh7ioo2nd86lg/l TJEjTOsYBsf98wl5R0XlpmgCKKKfawtSmzOxZzcmxAbXSlon+dyFt10FU2R65OF9neQTGp eba2gn/o31MrUX8sjAHMzYvjWDRn2p8tIc6x3jt63iag6G3jm3LrKfIQs2g4x2OChD8Yrx ItbRdf6R6UaISmM+UEXOTQ30Rv/3w6/vKYfbHw39ccJ92vjpCE8UvoYjPqArlw== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=pass header.d=debbugs.gnu.org header.s=debbugs-gnu-org header.b=Y2z1KS5U; dkim=fail ("headers rsa verify failed") header.d=posteo.net header.s=2017 header.b=BOpFdeGX; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of "guix-patches-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="guix-patches-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org"; dmarc=fail reason="SPF not aligned (strict), DKIM not aligned (strict)" header.from=posteo.net (policy=none) ARC-Seal: i=1; s=key1; d=yhetil.org; t=1736282250; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; b=Cd5pn8h/MrUuXcJE+IVE+YgDI9KQXGL95XZBR92wT4cD4Er2tx4I3uQijmzEIrEw2gBh0N mIruxiSz0JuCGtfjWJb7R6dAwEL78WGtN5iGD2oenC6auIUDh+7o5vQ40UvP3GbiYKrNzY CdMRB2rDb0Ltbi/gOISuF8mxDoPcAS3KyqDZfbUJfg/q4q+pVCIvbpzKymGLwDCzwxfz6U y7aDVvk8idbK75vK/zKXtdwHjd4U9JRhAwDSCusi8NvqkR85HkT4plbJh5wK0qB53BXQfq yqclozvQs+mtHxrVAJwyRbDaaFPxEFaU95GPbTIO8IdI9D3S7Jv6YvjjZOKscQ== Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A6CA3784B3 for ; Tue, 07 Jan 2025 21:37:29 +0100 (CET) Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1tVGK3-0004ik-Dm; Tue, 07 Jan 2025 15:37:08 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1tVGK1-0004iT-7f for guix-patches@gnu.org; Tue, 07 Jan 2025 15:37:05 -0500 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:5::43]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1tVGJz-0007g1-FE for guix-patches@gnu.org; Tue, 07 Jan 2025 15:37:03 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=debbugs.gnu.org; s=debbugs-gnu-org; h=MIME-Version:Date:References:In-Reply-To:From:To:Subject; bh=4OWGvviE3+lMc3RYiWIujhrOlyLEbucwlFKMjcaaqqA=; b=Y2z1KS5Ud9Cxzr1Zx1ci8I0p7KhZJjOCjPLcFMZtthd2h5mWFCwrRbQ/pxEZVzFloOSFARNsr8BHUM1P6jdExGkzcuLSl3pKIhpMESlljeMtR5pM8V838ooramVKYJtghQBFBqI9H1xQ6kMl5TnItUA7MuWQoCqkMxqki00kP4/3F1+5Rx3OG0PaFvGz4qUd01y6fyWddd71wermWHZcu9IIMyQigLNACLNKLjC1J+evrpbqOQtcP4Z7+RjJzlzXNUZhiAwkAv2dn9eg2C3pPwflLlUFH1rPZ3Pm3/pSNwszHs3SrgwKmAfmEKivrZO1ogpbsMmaARMrWdQtzyhqeQ==; Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1tVGJx-0005TC-SY for guix-patches@gnu.org; Tue, 07 Jan 2025 15:37:01 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: [bug#64114] Action? Resent-From: David Elsing Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: guix-patches@gnu.org Resent-Date: Tue, 07 Jan 2025 20:37:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 64114 X-GNU-PR-Package: guix-patches X-GNU-PR-Keywords: patch To: Andreas Enge , 64114@debbugs.gnu.org Received: via spool by 64114-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B64114.173628220220966 (code B ref 64114); Tue, 07 Jan 2025 20:37:01 +0000 Received: (at 64114) by debbugs.gnu.org; 7 Jan 2025 20:36:42 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:44860 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1tVGJd-0005S0-9q for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 07 Jan 2025 15:36:41 -0500 Received: from mout02.posteo.de ([185.67.36.66]:59517) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1tVGJZ-0005Qu-6U for 64114@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 07 Jan 2025 15:36:39 -0500 Received: from submission (posteo.de [185.67.36.169]) by mout02.posteo.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 865B7240101 for <64114@debbugs.gnu.org>; Tue, 7 Jan 2025 21:36:29 +0100 (CET) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=posteo.net; s=2017; t=1736282190; bh=4OWGvviE3+lMc3RYiWIujhrOlyLEbucwlFKMjcaaqqA=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:Message-ID:MIME-Version:Content-Type:From; b=BOpFdeGXIJC1cXy803SgBYc4AKZkuoDSUlH3AzNFEWfhkm686Of9N5zHgGJVB1bnn 2tdp8mHVGyJxmZfFnxpJEBZdwaoLmGnklB7q/WOrEW6Mp37RCb6C7FMITju0srA+XC Fht+GXgde9nIihLVoXI+UwUPt6wmNFuyY8UpiYwZKjwgpKOIeyg7GZyqvdP9+HrBxD WAMHpiN2BcvQd5GA/tvdXaj/OoXj5fHPGG9XjSAvGS3quirK9BwQGmUi+Qbe1IYYfd 1Ku/33+InR5AAcRbtqZYc8cm4LRZ3oTKVzGgTramb8j3yERXL411gZiPcz2r947jKu Ts12zQNXSSqYg== Received: from customer (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by submission (posteo.de) with ESMTPSA id 4YSNB41CcMz6tsb; Tue, 7 Jan 2025 21:36:28 +0100 (CET) From: David Elsing In-Reply-To: References: Date: Tue, 07 Jan 2025 20:36:27 +0000 Message-ID: <86v7uqs6no.fsf@posteo.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: guix-patches@gnu.org List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-patches-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org Sender: guix-patches-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org X-Migadu-Country: US X-Migadu-Flow: FLOW_IN X-Migadu-Queue-Id: A6CA3784B3 X-Migadu-Scanner: mx13.migadu.com X-Migadu-Spam-Score: 0.43 X-Spam-Score: 0.43 X-TUID: zBtoq4iImSAe Hello Andreas, sorry, I didn't see your reply before. Andreas Enge writes: > I happened to come along your patch and examined the situation. It turns out > that the fftw version has already been updated to 3.3.10. > > Unfortunately, lots of packages depend on it, so changing the package will > be quite costly. Maybe it would make sense to close the bug for now (or let > it wait) and come back to it when a new version of fftw comes out? FFTW isn't very actively developed, so it might take a while until there is a new release. I think it makes sense to leave the bug open until someone applies it when a dependency for fftw is updated (e.g. in core-updates). Do you think I should send updated patches rebased to master or would this just unnecessarily occupy QA? Best, David