From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mp1 ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by ms11 with LMTPS id AEEnEBVO/1+uIAAA0tVLHw (envelope-from ) for ; Wed, 13 Jan 2021 19:46:29 +0000 Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by mp1 with LMTPS id 6DHaCxVO/19FYQAAbx9fmQ (envelope-from ) for ; Wed, 13 Jan 2021 19:46:29 +0000 Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D6E9A9403C5 for ; Wed, 13 Jan 2021 19:46:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost ([::1]:56362 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kzm67-0000sY-Rk for larch@yhetil.org; Wed, 13 Jan 2021 14:46:27 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:45884) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kzm5i-0000ru-AN for guix-patches@gnu.org; Wed, 13 Jan 2021 14:46:02 -0500 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:53318) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kzm5i-0003CD-30 for guix-patches@gnu.org; Wed, 13 Jan 2021 14:46:02 -0500 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kzm5i-00037i-0p for guix-patches@gnu.org; Wed, 13 Jan 2021 14:46:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: [bug#45838] website: Add a Cuirass page. Resent-From: zimoun Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: guix-patches@gnu.org Resent-Date: Wed, 13 Jan 2021 19:46:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 45838 X-GNU-PR-Package: guix-patches X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: Mathieu Othacehe , Luis Felipe Received: via spool by 45838-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B45838.161056715811995 (code B ref 45838); Wed, 13 Jan 2021 19:46:01 +0000 Received: (at 45838) by debbugs.gnu.org; 13 Jan 2021 19:45:58 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:36631 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kzm5e-00037O-6H for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 13 Jan 2021 14:45:58 -0500 Received: from mail-wm1-f46.google.com ([209.85.128.46]:54673) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kzm5d-00037C-2w for 45838@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 13 Jan 2021 14:45:57 -0500 Received: by mail-wm1-f46.google.com with SMTP id i63so2661646wma.4 for <45838@debbugs.gnu.org>; Wed, 13 Jan 2021 11:45:56 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id :mime-version; bh=RaP+nM2bnHJRr0VDJ4w/QFxhk+Bgww/6yEw33JXSGfU=; b=Rrj/mztGcOtqnqARfGK6+ebcXom6pPDSvYZ2ajNNfStMXrxubKkHj/PM5rKDorIqIU AV2El36pxqnKbR3campzZaPzO3gzAF0cxgCF46+F4XcolGwplx+FN6sBe9HLgAp48Ywx Qp7RYyQsFfZ7npe7vh+Q6mA+DX5j8p4wnPa2jpqWtj0sAo2F6Q7V2wKJhFF27F35MkhJ kFZ34BzKa5eXpxFAtl5cHEdeD7hBSR04lNqXKaiEF8iDiParFJP0Pe6rkkqquMYA//Dd q3b4lNirgqlKqaOUW9bQIksw4eD63HV9Fa9avfJVqB0EA7/32uzFFxA0CISoQd2GK8rf YnzQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:mime-version; bh=RaP+nM2bnHJRr0VDJ4w/QFxhk+Bgww/6yEw33JXSGfU=; b=WZ1ipjzsMmsbLPkP+giwjKe0wIkhmPHUk4LFQYkV63V+MJ5Eekd+5jH13qYroYtggd twNKAj0aeNkxhNK+8koPw8CYvViR+MVww7PRA9ftPoGWrrBhHz0OxjPLoJ5a1qSfKzyD kg0ECn2PlHg8cri/Br/zgYqNwpduyegxWWOadEYZL/DL8s0/zSuAkiE9Giq79PKBO+n3 Z+lpEGlA0OxSTeVB/qD+m9nZBiTZkHw4QlESB/RP32udbnKNiKOp9v/DMgKxwcQh0nHU 3dhaOVCO0PHbTSBS4Ar5b0qzlVWddSF1r//pEWN1dQQaCSEFscqXy7E1utqperz5gXvp EaeQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531nC7SV0BTsyd9JKOTekO6nz785jszUiyo1stUYt5NKSbm9HQJd nfQGiEalQb5My6jUUe9sf5Ms9g8FmT4= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxlbcoKbBV5XYWf/AAS7EYLneumviPjZkmD2+RcOlogz4/NR0/+KAdyTDUxWF3kZarvLPzlfw== X-Received: by 2002:a1c:6506:: with SMTP id z6mr781160wmb.66.1610567151004; Wed, 13 Jan 2021 11:45:51 -0800 (PST) Received: from lili ([2a01:e0a:59b:9120:65d2:2476:f637:db1e]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id v4sm5284849wrw.42.2021.01.13.11.45.50 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Wed, 13 Jan 2021 11:45:50 -0800 (PST) From: zimoun In-Reply-To: <87ft34vlil.fsf@gnu.org> References: <87turlumws.fsf@gnu.org> <4WaiS3eePQjKlLOtJ0gBocgRwlSCv6dK5KkD4FOZVSfaQKkN6Yi8uHWij6jO7uC0dh_WYzzgXIM0ZWgaZSdk6Zsj-sLb5iV63grp7yWCgcs=@protonmail.com> <871reoanc7.fsf_-_@gnu.org> <87ft34vlil.fsf@gnu.org> Date: Wed, 13 Jan 2021 20:42:38 +0100 Message-ID: <86sg74sjwx.fsf@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: guix-patches@gnu.org List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: "45838@debbugs.gnu.org" <45838@debbugs.gnu.org> Errors-To: guix-patches-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-patches" X-Migadu-Flow: FLOW_IN X-Migadu-Spam-Score: -1.26 Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=fail (headers rsa verify failed) header.d=gmail.com header.s=20161025 header.b=Rrj/mztG; dmarc=fail reason="SPF not aligned (relaxed)" header.from=gmail.com (policy=none); spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of guix-patches-bounces@gnu.org designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=guix-patches-bounces@gnu.org X-Migadu-Queue-Id: D6E9A9403C5 X-Spam-Score: -1.26 X-Migadu-Scanner: scn0.migadu.com X-TUID: HsOqjI/eKIVi Hi, On Wed, 13 Jan 2021 at 17:39, Mathieu Othacehe wrote: > Hey Luis & Ludo, > >> If even more people dislike the name, I think it is a good time to consider alternatives before introducing a new image for the project. >> >> Don't worry about the current logo. It can be modified or redone. > > Thanks for commenting! As much as I would also like to change the name > of the project, I think now is maybe not the best time. > > I will announce soon that NLnet will sponsor some of the work I'm doing > on Cuirass and changing the name right now could be misleading. Maybe in > a few months? >From my point of view, it is a bad idea to rename, whatever when. Even if it is not the greatest name ever, rename would just add confusion and I do not see any gain (except personal taste). Why Cuirass for Continuous Integration? Why not! :-) Why Jenkins or Hudson? Why not. The logos are really nice! Thanks Luis. Cheers, simon