From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mp11.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:403:4789::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by ms9.migadu.com with LMTPS id 0HnOGQgd+WSd4wAA9RJhRA:P1 (envelope-from ) for ; Thu, 07 Sep 2023 02:44:56 +0200 Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:403:4789::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by mp11.migadu.com with LMTPS id 0HnOGQgd+WSd4wAA9RJhRA (envelope-from ) for ; Thu, 07 Sep 2023 02:44:56 +0200 Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 587FE640DC for ; Thu, 7 Sep 2023 02:44:56 +0200 (CEST) Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=pass header.d=gmail.com header.s=20221208 header.b=VDS0Bux8; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of "guix-devel-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="guix-devel-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org"; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=gmail.com ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yhetil.org; s=key1; t=1694047496; h=from:from:sender:sender:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date: message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:mime-version:mime-version: content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references:list-id:list-help: list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-post:dkim-signature; bh=5dDslzle/Z47kylSpM7wCC8EA52pRMx5WZyqA8om348=; b=dTZaMn2JcUtaV/XAGMUXVSSfMxqUBfHxA96Q2QLqbgeAq+0U9wABzkKxEzHxtGDIVsaji3 hmYboqqgcJpJNsutZ6dFtq0CP3rLFAebC6SIxMHkY0w04asMbKOFCpXGsS4nhIf6O6AjWD ek8E5UkfKyDirpQTOqLW62v0YRbuUN9rpZmz79COpDUcBYTxpt7vOUBu7IWCbmaqThETNF QREIPg0HRlF/7j69wE7X8JxWzMjqaVBNPSgLPdQhUGB3KjvAQxLmO/Tjwrs4ciT/HQJAew Q7nbTJ3qnmXsX2BByyYSVPgKUQakrK37penCmbNJJWxx2LLArtORLs4ty4RnZg== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=pass header.d=gmail.com header.s=20221208 header.b=VDS0Bux8; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of "guix-devel-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="guix-devel-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org"; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=gmail.com ARC-Seal: i=1; s=key1; d=yhetil.org; t=1694047496; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; b=AMzvJ0WGHzkOnqThB++JQYR0HSnMOIWnR/gnyJ4W2eKrfREjutou1wCjpnSlVxw/chTr5R IddXSYh28pMOilDqRZjYsVgRt9phUoTkWdwAIzYy+0gT435w5SVAjc00cQKBdYt5TSZMSs C1vATetw9JU1GHMHdygEQUv4Da+km0zxisoFWWy6LgXZFnlxeAMotGiEkmzLr2o04pxfSO vh2CRoF7Lpa36qWCIpIjb/YzC0XQxe4EftcTgNZJFubuKqqL/EJoO4Pj8NApYr7+/2UcyJ o/zSPDhmODrYKBIOubDQ3WzhqbskNzhCio926c2DKya8NNIFR0bsKLD+QEg/Xw== Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1qe37g-0006vE-0c; Wed, 06 Sep 2023 20:43:52 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1qe37Q-0006Qf-C8 for guix-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 06 Sep 2023 20:43:37 -0400 Received: from mail-wm1-x335.google.com ([2a00:1450:4864:20::335]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1qe37L-0002iy-Kl for guix-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 06 Sep 2023 20:43:35 -0400 Received: by mail-wm1-x335.google.com with SMTP id 5b1f17b1804b1-402ba03c754so947895e9.0 for ; Wed, 06 Sep 2023 17:43:30 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20221208; t=1694047410; x=1694652210; darn=gnu.org; h=content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:message-id:date:references :in-reply-to:subject:to:from:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id :reply-to; bh=5dDslzle/Z47kylSpM7wCC8EA52pRMx5WZyqA8om348=; b=VDS0Bux8XSP1PrO2rmg/dfCNRzqgixhG/2XkJ7PZc+2Z1tssCGWnLl6zOBSW3AIqVQ 9dsmrEfuveSZTc+qiXCTirSRC8lvg1FbVmfUEmzDiFRA76qEuNA3T5dsnJgYVFfKydUQ y0xHT3UHheasZwWhwrrNKHOey4vDiJ6Qk6bTXrtxvxJs6wRb1D0PJGGqjG51Fuv2B1V3 4RaanO92D1MbqInBJGZ9edFFeVAXiNvKPjLjr58vY5hLR7y4m2Z8P2XAhrtJBHg3Eulg CNVh8GJ1qYCGfagmKr2Kfskd/wUk2WhhAR7kblfMQkQR+E3yKHXVGwdvc+BYGLFeL2Td 1CDw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20221208; t=1694047410; x=1694652210; h=content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:message-id:date:references :in-reply-to:subject:to:from:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject :date:message-id:reply-to; bh=5dDslzle/Z47kylSpM7wCC8EA52pRMx5WZyqA8om348=; b=IrFzk3wR8rusMixdaoJU/0j6IZuzjq4MLzWQH/hPA9o1gfIAsr5acQddsJ9QAQumeQ O/OJBohyvYiU56d+XeKMI9ZNOmG2P7of11MACx99WiA29lVbl+Yd5DitUTTvktGzDU/C zVQpt6G4Dz4xMNKbFIdOU0vIQmFxy9uhY6Dh1/HXgDefHZfLl3lst61aJIpEae3EjykY YhlKYokQhwo5ed9Tlm8uSZTvIj5q80KU2otBlkxWVYFgXCpejfacOAGc9EMR4jdN/C4J +6V4zJ7/iDOLsuNMvPwy7Xb3zNrx0zQq18G5jz8TutrGVFsB9mvmXK7+KEzx+tlUoZ5y xT5g== X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0Yw93LwgxbW66j5eq7OMK9n9iXxh1SEyJGf7gBQAuarh+s8FyXuc A/V8LttAg2dFe4HF58oRFQV2Ouc4ZLo= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IGPnjfFSjX9d6W96l3JEEr5NCuAX+bRh6jx1EQdHpXQ5d281NzFVg1/+uhjYhZMVJdd5ICVIg== X-Received: by 2002:a05:6000:14a:b0:317:630d:1e8e with SMTP id r10-20020a056000014a00b00317630d1e8emr13282791wrx.2.1694047409623; Wed, 06 Sep 2023 17:43:29 -0700 (PDT) Received: from lili ([2a01:e0a:59b:9120:65d2:2476:f637:db1e]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id h12-20020a5d688c000000b0031ae2a7adb5sm21731128wru.85.2023.09.06.17.43.29 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Wed, 06 Sep 2023 17:43:29 -0700 (PDT) From: Simon Tournier To: Christopher Baines , guix-devel@gnu.org Subject: Re: Process for reviewing patches as someone without commit access In-Reply-To: <87o7ifb66o.fsf@cbaines.net> References: <87o7ifb66o.fsf@cbaines.net> Date: Thu, 07 Sep 2023 01:59:33 +0200 Message-ID: <86sf7qn996.fsf@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Received-SPF: pass client-ip=2a00:1450:4864:20::335; envelope-from=zimon.toutoune@gmail.com; helo=mail-wm1-x335.google.com X-Spam_score_int: -20 X-Spam_score: -2.1 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.1 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: guix-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org Sender: guix-devel-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org X-Migadu-Flow: FLOW_IN X-Migadu-Country: US X-Migadu-Queue-Id: 587FE640DC X-Migadu-Scanner: mx1.migadu.com X-Migadu-Spam-Score: -8.08 X-Spam-Score: -8.08 X-TUID: ddcnkaO0//uF Hi Chris, all, On Wed, 06 Sep 2023 at 16:55, Christopher Baines wrote: > Once we know what tags to use, I can have the QA frontpage do something > similar to the "Mark as moreinfo" links, so it's easy to just click a > button then send the email to change the state of a issue. That=E2=80=99s cool! Well, using emacs-debbugs and then C-u M-x debbugs-gnu-usertags guix-patches RET the list of usertags is: guix-patches for-core-updates guix-patches reviewed-looks-good And if instead of guix-patches we consider guix then it reads, guix build-system guix cross-compilation guix for-core-updates guix looks-good guix patch guix plz-work guix powerpc64le-linux guix ready-to-review guix reproducibility guix reviewed guix reviewed-looks-good guix test-tag guix v1.3.0 However, I do not know how to list all the bugs for the package guix-patches that matches the usertag reviewed-looks-good. Anyway! I think that the usertag =E2=80=99reviewed=E2=80=99 is a good idea. That w= ould be a very good start. Then if it helps, we could add other usertags as reviewed-julia for patches that the Julia team can merge. Discussing about idea, would it be possible that the QA infrastructure automatically send a message to Debbugs for tagging? For example, the usertag =E2=80=99qa-ok=E2=80=99 or whatever other meaningful name. :-) Well, we can start with one usertag for only the architecture x86_64. If this one is green, then it is worth to start the review. It would help for filtering. The slippery slope is to have too much usertags. I think we should start with one or two usertags and see if it helps. WDYT? Cheers, simon