From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mp11.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by ms5.migadu.com with LMTPS id gAOgIvF/j2PozgAAbAwnHQ (envelope-from ) for ; Tue, 06 Dec 2022 18:46:25 +0100 Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by mp11.migadu.com with LMTPS id IO+lIvF/j2OCQQEA9RJhRA (envelope-from ) for ; Tue, 06 Dec 2022 18:46:25 +0100 Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0832D29008 for ; Tue, 6 Dec 2022 18:46:24 +0100 (CET) Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1p2c1B-0003FN-Q5; Tue, 06 Dec 2022 12:46:09 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1p2c15-0003Ca-8j for guix-patches@gnu.org; Tue, 06 Dec 2022 12:46:03 -0500 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1p2c15-0005Yd-0T for guix-patches@gnu.org; Tue, 06 Dec 2022 12:46:03 -0500 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1p2c14-0006G2-QA for guix-patches@gnu.org; Tue, 06 Dec 2022 12:46:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: [bug#59822] [PATCH guix-artwork] website: base: home: Add 'DOWNLOAD LATEST' button. Resent-From: zimoun Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: guix-patches@gnu.org Resent-Date: Tue, 06 Dec 2022 17:46:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 59822 X-GNU-PR-Package: guix-patches X-GNU-PR-Keywords: patch To: "pelzflorian (Florian Pelz)" Cc: "\(" , 59822@debbugs.gnu.org Received: via spool by 59822-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B59822.167034872824018 (code B ref 59822); Tue, 06 Dec 2022 17:46:02 +0000 Received: (at 59822) by debbugs.gnu.org; 6 Dec 2022 17:45:28 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:44222 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1p2c0V-0006FK-Ji for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 06 Dec 2022 12:45:28 -0500 Received: from mail-wm1-f46.google.com ([209.85.128.46]:46785) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1p2c0Q-0006F0-PU for 59822@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 06 Dec 2022 12:45:26 -0500 Received: by mail-wm1-f46.google.com with SMTP id f13-20020a1cc90d000000b003d08c4cf679so9390879wmb.5 for <59822@debbugs.gnu.org>; Tue, 06 Dec 2022 09:45:22 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:message-id:date:references :in-reply-to:subject:cc:to:from:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id :reply-to; bh=KrNFdNZ4Sq8u+cvEaXXSAOVO1eKh9QGHyyjAibmFYR8=; b=C4AjlKlAjiKO2OMelawC98BQBizXZ+d7X5qD7WjXQ1Zp0AWO9PmgRK68rT64Sx/D68 fyXpQqsaKXKIUeIseKO36vYCLeX2rOfOP8YL/L+RHHlwBWRDSsywLgXuxEzynC1xgWD8 OBBJ6l46bdnPEFrIM5Xjd4JI3j8/YCAcePsaNEPuc1d3WQ0wtoGwxzUnsVKWIMhufD6m 9HIJhat4zbpZRIgpzZq1/D48WGgEJsxxMa43JfdQI8Q8JFgxN3tADwBXBzaOa1sDhwvI rUl7dWwMcq2SqXmn45KjPoEAlM8s1NJXcog8Yxla0EECkDZoI/aJ/Rx1ruYsC84EdplX 051w== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:message-id:date:references :in-reply-to:subject:cc:to:from:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc :subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=KrNFdNZ4Sq8u+cvEaXXSAOVO1eKh9QGHyyjAibmFYR8=; b=BbE95NiTFjNm4CNkpwC3YQrNnbm5HbvCH7VJrbbShGH2OUvv/5chyyYl9OuvkuJAeF RHTKQote2RYtCYMVINC4h7kiJVc1QtmcCE+WzIlpi76bv9AJSyWgL9p6IA5hoFdb+4mz GB4bcVjKP4Ejmg3D42pXuIbDS7avhSai9wj2Zfvp7sxiGNhSS3K//eZhi0lVhVPVixOk LsdmYJ04eiu/7jgbUgKavPg9pBwuK9/avbApmxKLr6u1MQcDvlTCIg42SVDFGdz1yWAy LDpSmQzY2etoYV9qSJ4i46EDrkHq2QNb1c95g3ZpjsztSIsn9SW2ZwH63JLotjzCv4TQ HvGA== X-Gm-Message-State: ANoB5plkMJ6cAtVmnk9j6D7Fn1tow/YI90dhx023LE5BBeByrQalD1Ga opVfQPcPwkHQ9sJO32nS4kKS6AM/wHQ= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AA0mqf7oUHBkS2Kn66OIk77hIEI7JhAQCHYBfLZzQ7CrY1kAea5LSjojqtkTeE+X86awKk/l5h5RRQ== X-Received: by 2002:a7b:c451:0:b0:3d1:ee27:745b with SMTP id l17-20020a7bc451000000b003d1ee27745bmr2365345wmi.201.1670348716731; Tue, 06 Dec 2022 09:45:16 -0800 (PST) Received: from lili ([2a01:e0a:59b:9120:65d2:2476:f637:db1e]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id o16-20020adfead0000000b00241cfa9333fsm17542863wrn.5.2022.12.06.09.45.15 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Tue, 06 Dec 2022 09:45:16 -0800 (PST) From: zimoun In-Reply-To: <87o7sg5w5n.fsf@pelzflorian.de> References: <20221204195007.20997-1-paren@disroot.org> <87edterg7x.fsf@pelzflorian.de> <87a642rfui.fsf@pelzflorian.de> <875yeqrfmz.fsf@pelzflorian.de> <878rjm9t5l.fsf@pelzflorian.de> <86tu2a444p.fsf@gmail.com> <87edtdu6ew.fsf@pelzflorian.de> <86edtckc8l.fsf@gmail.com> <87o7sg5w5n.fsf@pelzflorian.de> Date: Tue, 06 Dec 2022 18:45:13 +0100 Message-ID: <86pmcwifyu.fsf@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: guix-patches@gnu.org List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-patches-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org Sender: guix-patches-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org X-Migadu-Flow: FLOW_IN X-Migadu-Country: US ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yhetil.org; s=key1; t=1670348785; h=from:from:sender:sender:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date: message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version: content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding:resent-cc: resent-from:resent-sender:resent-message-id:in-reply-to:in-reply-to: references:references:list-id:list-help:list-unsubscribe: list-subscribe:list-post:dkim-signature; bh=KrNFdNZ4Sq8u+cvEaXXSAOVO1eKh9QGHyyjAibmFYR8=; b=qgR3w3nr9A+CO3H10mvn5ee9STxgTAlFGR0qsCKIby3fZ+jrG3VRBGeY+0uyT3TGVwsVW5 dWfFIhiypjlDQaUpgmOwVkz/hG0zUFo0Yh32zovV06TqF1i9zMptpuTZ6Ob7T2mHzLPSQ4 CUBPtQlvGioo1Kfxx2Ng8XeZ04vHsiHtVvY+UZ2eBa1cQYoZudJL+Z3gvYzZZqQC4C8KMk lS1R+JQEb0EtX0GaVfo4I3NfOBReiuT7ugM2YYmmTNMzec9dLzfWdRgiqQjyg66zcdyj2e NCsbJaUJVB8JdkYb9j9+bzuKoNxewcZOOPuwpdd7NTtXyCi4rXTYpsmMY7k5hw== ARC-Seal: i=1; s=key1; d=yhetil.org; t=1670348785; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; b=CGfynuop5fb8/F2RXs79yl/F8PdIGVCq5ySugAJfoQa4akhHfid2Bs5z7ee/czHv8q4IiI /YO/LLQjj0dzALK4qkDffL2yzJKrv13tIU8IxUsYmFOnVp5XzegOP0BkUSpziF5qCDIFnf 6neTx7qvQwrgDJaqEOB0+7CjRfVkeT46OuS9wp5bzaf8ORbsW5Fq82CzBAme/LzOgSxX8Z YRPZCv8ZHpvmfX318ThjDPdMcniVO1jFhO69KVCLPPnMj7QNZ/QMecn5gIr7HVDxh7Z3/1 XVGq4zWhck/Mk4b7L+CDxI9Bpu26LgnHxSB1I8e8Sq/1q6rd4aeSLfge+BM0qg== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=fail ("headers rsa verify failed") header.d=gmail.com header.s=20210112 header.b=C4AjlKlA; dmarc=fail reason="SPF not aligned (relaxed)" header.from=gmail.com (policy=none); spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of "guix-patches-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="guix-patches-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" X-Migadu-Spam-Score: 6.04 Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=fail ("headers rsa verify failed") header.d=gmail.com header.s=20210112 header.b=C4AjlKlA; dmarc=fail reason="SPF not aligned (relaxed)" header.from=gmail.com (policy=none); spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of "guix-patches-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="guix-patches-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" X-Migadu-Queue-Id: 0832D29008 X-Spam-Score: 6.04 X-Migadu-Scanner: scn1.migadu.com X-TUID: V7TTFSUDwgLr Hi, On Tue, 06 Dec 2022 at 17:33, "pelzflorian (Florian Pelz)" wrote: > Yes (=E2=80=99s patch was merely about discoverability of the latest inst= aller > page, that already exists. Also the latest installer page has a warning > that points users to the standard installer. So we could push For what it is worth, I think it is better to keep the front page with only 2 buttons: =E2=80=9CDownload v1.x=E2=80=9C and =E2=80=9CContribute=E2= =80=9D. For discoverability, what I propose instead is to redirect the users from, https://guix.gnu.org/en/download/ If the user does not read the header or is not interested in, they can process with the current released images. Otherwise, as I propose, a mention to the latest development, and hop to the other page, https://guix.gnu.org/en/download/latest/ > But then, shouldn=E2=80=99t we tell users there are bugs in the standard = image and > they better use latest? By mentioning in the header of: https://guix.gnu.org/en/download/ For example, it reads, --8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8--- As of version 1.3.0, the standalone Guix System can be installed on an i686, x86_64, ARMv7, or AArch64 machine. It uses the Linux-Libre kernel and the GNU Shepherd init system. Alternately, GNU Guix can be installed as an additional package manager on top of an installed Linux-based system. --8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8--- Therefore, we can add here one sentence or two for mentioning 1. the latest download webpage and 2. the potential issue. > Could we maybe wait until such reasons pop up for 1.4.0? Or have a new > standard installer independent of the Guix release? As every program, bugs are around. ;-) I mean, I do not see why we should wait. > Mathieu will know better, but I think there were few issues with 1.3.0 > (UUID checks in commit f5d9d6ec68f78f5651bd5a698f489ab57bf77d5d) but > latest has better logging. On the other hand, the latest installer had > few new bugs except missing mkfs.ext4. >From my opinion, the latest installer has less bugs than the v1.3 one. :-) >> Therefore, I still propose on the webpage >> to add this sentence: >> >> These images are well-tested released images, and since Guix follows >> rolling release model, the [latest development images are >> here](https://guix.gnu.org/en/download/latest/). > > Why mention rolling release? It is a proposal. :-) I do not know if it is the correct wording. The idea is to explain that the installer is continuously improved. The model is not stable (release) vs unstable (development) but instead frozen (release) vs latest. And mention (point) this latest webpage. I think this proposal about mentioning the latest download webpage from the current release webpage improves about discoverability. And it keeps the usual entry point with the current release =E2=80=93 for sure, it= is well-tested and it should be the recommended way for installing. Cheers, simon