From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mp2 ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by ms11 with LMTPS id kDQnKJsL3V/fGAAA0tVLHw (envelope-from ) for ; Fri, 18 Dec 2020 20:05:47 +0000 Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by mp2 with LMTPS id KOrsI5sL3V8hWgAAB5/wlQ (envelope-from ) for ; Fri, 18 Dec 2020 20:05:47 +0000 Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 54AFE9405D4 for ; Fri, 18 Dec 2020 20:05:47 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost ([::1]:54264 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kqM0Y-0004EG-9M for larch@yhetil.org; Fri, 18 Dec 2020 15:05:46 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:45662) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kqLyu-0003Wn-GN for bug-guix@gnu.org; Fri, 18 Dec 2020 15:04:05 -0500 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:56731) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kqLyt-0002NL-Rf for bug-guix@gnu.org; Fri, 18 Dec 2020 15:04:04 -0500 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kqLys-0002wx-Mc for bug-guix@gnu.org; Fri, 18 Dec 2020 15:04:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#25752: Acknowledgement (go incremental builds broken) Resent-From: zimoun Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-guix@gnu.org Resent-Date: Fri, 18 Dec 2020 20:04:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 25752 X-GNU-PR-Package: guix X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: Leo Famulari Received: via spool by 25752-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B25752.160832178211263 (code B ref 25752); Fri, 18 Dec 2020 20:04:02 +0000 Received: (at 25752) by debbugs.gnu.org; 18 Dec 2020 20:03:02 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:40043 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kqLxu-0002vM-3h for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 18 Dec 2020 15:03:02 -0500 Received: from mail-wm1-f47.google.com ([209.85.128.47]:40432) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kqLxk-0002uV-D0 for 25752@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 18 Dec 2020 15:02:52 -0500 Received: by mail-wm1-f47.google.com with SMTP id r4so3874741wmh.5 for <25752@debbugs.gnu.org>; Fri, 18 Dec 2020 12:02:52 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=from:to:cc:subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id :user-agent:mime-version; bh=LI2hKvPd96zr5x+BcRbul71VolO9o/Ohno2bdAvfkRk=; b=qCCNz/X61qkB5u3QK21GAjF4zDM/rmtunM6rihhOLf5NGCPuyv35NF3hHR6FHMPGGa mg9/Vo8s7xhoT6W6fyn5qNugqFxkwXqu271l2aA2wYNmiszf9iJDIw6OvJi4afVsk5zg 1Wp/ZnIGp6A+LxAToc7g66OBwPFIr5AbujDJsmt66Tpk0FRh/Ra8H+BYwf0VYMHU8CKk zlWn/QsRbaAxXQdY8oWoF9kw0/Z3Qn4Jludhw/6TOmLP/a/AkY6TlkqEAdkcdX5n81gY Ili642FGihTSd/o4/gp80YbSHtcHMfZskYJcAC/p9XfZcx0P483b1+h0rEm2KaC0ovqo 1Wbw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:references:date:in-reply-to :message-id:user-agent:mime-version; bh=LI2hKvPd96zr5x+BcRbul71VolO9o/Ohno2bdAvfkRk=; b=Hu1TgnKa8bmliMUXuOqT+zFpEcQYRxeh4kWsL2KiVvLo0ZNOPNeBz3FbQQ8QOOaZLe q7sSDzUhymttXsukfZitfFiB6GfLrcvOCNM9sS6XFmBZvbtbaK5cjMMhP1TXmNuNnB27 fJ+xwWlxUH/Fwt4r4MMBommlu/skf+Q5Zo7ImLdk0/tYMc8yiMVAqqUQwHX3cUZjzqaU 1GQOuUgakULuJ8+k/3SJvTeRsDXgL+NfmUZZQRrLae1621iS2UHnAWKCet9+GbQ3lcxR xr/H0OFcaUppzZwMmX2pOq0IGX/9ZbMy5k850UdwHl02g3aMUcAC5XVfA6A2CpIWRhG2 /wYA== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531Ai7U6RfgnAWZLIfOaU1L3WbuC1SO2yJCQqiRrfudnGrDYvEbm LnA+EQe3hjhI8rdryzHgAqLX4R/F9tE= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyvZMGgK0X1P3fSLglm4iUjBFW3itlXmxQXk+UBMqex7XpG9q7td7C1chsUjCKCyrXtk31hUg== X-Received: by 2002:a1c:204e:: with SMTP id g75mr5718277wmg.100.1608321766856; Fri, 18 Dec 2020 12:02:46 -0800 (PST) Received: from lili ([2a01:e0a:59b:9120:65d2:2476:f637:db1e]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id o8sm14680697wrm.17.2020.12.18.12.02.46 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Fri, 18 Dec 2020 12:02:46 -0800 (PST) From: zimoun References: <20170225155814.GB3227@jasmine> Date: Fri, 18 Dec 2020 21:00:14 +0100 In-Reply-To: <20170225155814.GB3227@jasmine> (Leo Famulari's message of "Sat, 25 Feb 2017 10:58:14 -0500") Message-ID: <86mtyavq9d.fsf@gmail.com> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.1 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-guix@gnu.org List-Id: Bug reports for GNU Guix List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: 25752@debbugs.gnu.org, Hank Donnay Errors-To: bug-guix-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org Sender: "bug-Guix" X-Migadu-Flow: FLOW_IN X-Migadu-Spam-Score: -1.22 Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=fail (headers rsa verify failed) header.d=gmail.com header.s=20161025 header.b=qCCNz/X6; dmarc=fail reason="SPF not aligned (relaxed)" header.from=gmail.com (policy=none); spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of bug-guix-bounces@gnu.org designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=bug-guix-bounces@gnu.org X-Migadu-Queue-Id: 54AFE9405D4 X-Spam-Score: -1.22 X-Migadu-Scanner: scn0.migadu.com X-TUID: UO8S8BswqliA Hi, On Sat, 25 Feb 2017 at 10:58, Leo Famulari wrote: > On Fri, Feb 24, 2017 at 02:50:10PM -0500, Hank Donnay wrote: >> After talking on IRC, it seems like grafts are the problem. Adding >> `--no-grafts` to the above commands has them succeed. >> >> The GOROOT (store location, in this case) gets encoded in the >> generated source by the 'dist' tool, so changing that is going to >> cause issues. >> >> Is there a way to disable grafts on a per-package basis, in the definition? > > You can disable them on the command-line for any tool that builds > things, using the '--no-grafts' option, which is a "Common build option" > [0]. For example, `guix environment --ad-hoc go --no-grafts`. > > If you do this, you should understand that the ungrafted Go package will > contain some serious security vulnerabilities, since we only use grafts > to fix vulnerabilities in core packages. [1] > > We should figure out why this issue manifests when go is grafted, and > fix the root cause. I suspect closing this bug had been forgotten. If yes, feel free to close it. Otherwise, I do not understand what is the next actionable step. All the best, simon