From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mp1 ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by ms11 with LMTPS id CHJ7N+qUEGCmUwAA0tVLHw (envelope-from ) for ; Tue, 26 Jan 2021 22:17:14 +0000 Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by mp1 with LMTPS id sO1lM+qUEGAcEwAAbx9fmQ (envelope-from ) for ; Tue, 26 Jan 2021 22:17:14 +0000 Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5A053940481 for ; Tue, 26 Jan 2021 22:17:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost ([::1]:49584 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1l4We9-0000od-BA for larch@yhetil.org; Tue, 26 Jan 2021 17:17:13 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:37234) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1l4Wdz-0000ne-Nm for guix-patches@gnu.org; Tue, 26 Jan 2021 17:17:03 -0500 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:59573) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1l4Wdx-0000kZ-T3 for guix-patches@gnu.org; Tue, 26 Jan 2021 17:17:03 -0500 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1l4Wdx-0006nD-Ou for guix-patches@gnu.org; Tue, 26 Jan 2021 17:17:01 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: [bug#45893] [PATCH 0/2] DRAFT: Hint for options. Resent-From: zimoun Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: guix-patches@gnu.org Resent-Date: Tue, 26 Jan 2021 22:17:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 45893 X-GNU-PR-Package: guix-patches X-GNU-PR-Keywords: patch To: Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= Received: via spool by 45893-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B45893.161169937326044 (code B ref 45893); Tue, 26 Jan 2021 22:17:01 +0000 Received: (at 45893) by debbugs.gnu.org; 26 Jan 2021 22:16:13 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:42884 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1l4WdB-0006m0-2l for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 26 Jan 2021 17:16:13 -0500 Received: from mail-wm1-f52.google.com ([209.85.128.52]:35843) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1l4Wd9-0006ln-Iv for 45893@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 26 Jan 2021 17:16:12 -0500 Received: by mail-wm1-f52.google.com with SMTP id i9so4069642wmq.1 for <45893@debbugs.gnu.org>; Tue, 26 Jan 2021 14:16:11 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id :mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=QPNAYkLIo90XrbdIYC7MFPpjZs6ElewglJQsOOWBMT4=; b=NV5okcF8cQRPdR03jJxUXNHJeHlL9Nx048o8N1OorZIV8lueWxbydda1Qry2x+/ZTq xsPbh5W1nQKUgvJ++kJK297zwasrTpzLqtjtp+kNfBv17lhTMJ9ELRVrYulJp6pb4XR3 QO3k515q76wwRfoCLrMHW+sXC6nbxolY6Js/ITcZAszU/527svuMLE5Iv6BWILJvCSrd goOl2Z1fTxKre2T2dbZGa4Wx7zTX+aRcrLjf69+0+jHUdHaxD67K3ScwiimO94ApX8YS uSrBiyhMZC8pseH0N0J45gQkYZKM+39hJSOlrU7wSmO25VMDdtEwiSC6sgoNtUp53qPb pNAg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=QPNAYkLIo90XrbdIYC7MFPpjZs6ElewglJQsOOWBMT4=; b=jVwrzpgj/4N/g3irXecHbBD9AwX9QTKL8PYbBJw4V2mti84KRbX68A8ZTrIIiQqTNJ 037IIApUnett4oudRS4onBGQmnbChsUAAzLU5PrPImT6PA5GtxxAfhNpMNErxhI2iMQE 1gJwDYSTtj/NJQpeAdOpKW7anldAl8FhMsu9jgdHQOEi8yCvW0l096KPPSzqF+lJAb72 rTK/vzWlzTXHTF7EGt9r9qv3GoW/DqCJh75IcZxW+4BJDFXeBntM4LY2L0uaeJIIR2PW WyKTWNNryw0GA7ErkUyAdTxZC88gf4ZegJoojjsj93aO2Aa52CQJTRRPubSVAj7bWQ6X tCdA== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM5301suJSYnHnm8Yk5N7nfZFrU5/Af+jCjwSE4C3MLAhvsyAwvqji CXZtlaG9aKQT67oPDX7BeP34SBkJeEg= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzdLkyELtBXQHxDxzl0hptt6NaWC6Jds9To4gjc6QuGKDfQNAzLuuVUfocleUFevTkOYs3kKw== X-Received: by 2002:a05:600c:414b:: with SMTP id h11mr1546827wmm.4.1611699365514; Tue, 26 Jan 2021 14:16:05 -0800 (PST) Received: from lili ([88.126.110.68]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id z4sm148718wrw.38.2021.01.26.14.16.04 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Tue, 26 Jan 2021 14:16:05 -0800 (PST) From: zimoun In-Reply-To: <87ft2nxumw.fsf_-_@gnu.org> References: <20210115163732.53665-1-zimon.toutoune@gmail.com> <20210119212810.20681-1-zimon.toutoune@gmail.com> <87ft2nxumw.fsf_-_@gnu.org> Date: Tue, 26 Jan 2021 23:05:32 +0100 Message-ID: <86lfcficb7.fsf@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: guix-patches@gnu.org List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: 45893@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: guix-patches-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-patches" X-Migadu-Flow: FLOW_IN X-Migadu-Spam-Score: -1.25 Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=fail ("headers rsa verify failed") header.d=gmail.com header.s=20161025 header.b=NV5okcF8; dmarc=fail reason="SPF not aligned (relaxed)" header.from=gmail.com (policy=none); spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of guix-patches-bounces@gnu.org designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=guix-patches-bounces@gnu.org X-Migadu-Queue-Id: 5A053940481 X-Spam-Score: -1.25 X-Migadu-Scanner: scn0.migadu.com X-TUID: pot9tbMet8XX Hi Ludo, On Tue, 26 Jan 2021 at 22:20, Ludovic Court=C3=A8s wrote: > And the rest LGTM! > > So I don=E2=80=99t know, should we try a more efficient-but-still-readable > variant right away, or should we first apply these three patches? Well, I have implemented [1] the full matrix version, almost copy/paste from Wikipedia [2]. :-) Ugly, isn=E2=80=99t it! Let merge and improve if required, IMHO. As Arun mentioned in the =C2=ABimproving =E2=80=9Cguix search=E2=80=9D=C2=BB thread, maybe it is wor= th to give a look at the Guile string library. However, there is a missing point not discussed and important: it only works for =E2=80=99parse-command-line=E2=80=99 and not =E2=80=99args-fold*= =E2=80=99. The main reason is: I have not found how to raise the hint for these both functions without code duplication. If there is no technical blocking point, I would like to replace (with care and double-check) all the =E2=80=99args-fold*=E2=80=99 by =E2=80=99par= se-command-line=E2=80=99. An unified CLI entry-point. Well, extend what is done for =E2=80=9Cguix show=E2=80=9D and =E2=80=9Cguix= search=E2=80=9D for all the commands. In one commit. WDYT? 1: 2: Cheers, simon